Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Surendran vs Beena

Surendran vs BEENA

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 26, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281854

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RPFC/324/2015
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surendran

Respondent

BEENA

Excerpt

..1..in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable dr. justice kauser edappagath wednesday, the 26th day of march 2025 / 5th chaithra, 1947 rpfc no. 324 of 2015 against the order dated 16.06.2015 in mc no.348 of 2014 of family court, nedumangadu revision petitioner/respondent:surendran aged 44 years, s/o sivankutty chettiyar, siva vilasom,maranad, bharathannoor po, thiruvananthapruam-695 609 by adv sri.a.s.shammy raj respondents/petitioners: 1 beena d/o syamala, kunnumpurathu veedu, 2 suvitha d/o surendran, kunnumpurathu veedu, kannamkode, kochuvila po, peringamala, thiruvananthapuram-695 563 3 subin s/o surendran, kunnumpurathu veedu, ..2.. by advs. sri.abu mathew sri.aju mathew this rev.petition(family court) having come up for admission on 26.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: ..3..orderit is submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- dr. kauser edappagath judge apa

Full Judgment

..1..

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE KAUSER EDAPPAGATH WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 RPFC NO. 324 OF 2015 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 16.06.2015 IN MC NO.348 OF 2014 OF FAMILY COURT, NEDUMANGADU REVISION PETITIONER/RESPONDENT:

SURENDRAN AGED 44 YEARS, S/O SIVANKUTTY CHETTIYAR, SIVA VILASOM,MARANAD, BHARATHANNOOR PO, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM-695 609 BY ADV SRI.A.S.SHAMMY RAJ RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 BEENA D/O SYAMALA, KUNNUMPURATHU VEEDU, 2 SUVITHA D/O SURENDRAN, KUNNUMPURATHU VEEDU, KANNAMKODE, KOCHUVILA PO, PERINGAMALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 563 3 SUBIN S/O SURENDRAN, KUNNUMPURATHU VEEDU, ..2.. BY ADVS. SRI.ABU MATHEW SRI.AJU MATHEW THIS REV.PETITION(FAMILY COURT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: ..3..

ORDER

It is submitted that the matter has been settled between the parties and hence the petitioner does not want to proceed with the matter. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- DR. KAUSER EDAPPAGATH JUDGE APA

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial