Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Chacko vs Mathew and Another

Chacko vs Mathew and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 03, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281825

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1186/2011
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Chacko

Respondent

Mathew and Another

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice m.a.abdul hakhim thursday, the 3rd day of april 2025 / 13th chaithra, 1947 against the judgment dated 24.03.2011 in as no.5 of 2010 of sub court, kattappana arising out of the judgment dated 23.12.2009 in os no.26 of 2008 of munsiff court, idukki appellant/appellant/plaintiff: chacko, aged 74 years, s/o mathai, thekkedathu house, kanakkunnu kara,, marygiri p.o., vathikkudy village, udumbanchola taluk, idukki district, pin-685 515.by advs. smt.p.p.stella sri.bijimon c.cherian respondents/respondents/defendants: 1 mathew, aged about 47 years, s/o.mathai, kizhakkinathu house, kanakkunnu kara, marygiri.p.o, vathikkudy village, udumbanchola taluk,, 2 susamma, aged about 47 years w/o.mathew, kizhakkinathu house, kanakkunnu kara, marygiri.p.o, vathikkudy village, udumbanchola taluk, this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 03.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentin spite of repeated orders, the appellant has not taken steps. the learned counsel for the appellant is absent today. he was absent last time also. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. sd/- m.a.abdul hakhim judge mus

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 13TH CHAITHRA, 1947 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.03.2011 IN AS NO.5 OF 2010 OF SUB COURT, KATTAPPANA ARISING OUT OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 23.12.2009 IN OS NO.26 OF 2008 OF MUNSIFF COURT, IDUKKI APPELLANT/APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF: CHACKO, AGED 74 YEARS, S/O MATHAI, THEKKEDATHU HOUSE, KANAKKUNNU KARA,, MARYGIRI P.O., VATHIKKUDY VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT, PIN-685 515.

BY ADVS. SMT.P.P.STELLA SRI.BIJIMON C.CHERIAN RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 MATHEW, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, S/O.MATHAI, KIZHAKKINATHU HOUSE, KANAKKUNNU KARA, MARYGIRI.P.O, VATHIKKUDY VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK,, 2 SUSAMMA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS W/O.MATHEW, KIZHAKKINATHU HOUSE, KANAKKUNNU KARA, MARYGIRI.P.O, VATHIKKUDY VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK, THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

In spite of repeated orders, the appellant has not taken steps. The learned counsel for the appellant is absent today. He was absent last time also. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM JUDGE mus

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial