Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Subran and 4 Others vs Kairali

Subran and 4 Others vs Kairali

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 01, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281818

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RSA/1007/2011
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Subran and 4 Others

Respondent

Kairali

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan thursday, the 20th day of february 2020 / 1st phalguna, 1941 rsa.no.1007 of 2011 against the judgment & decree dated 13-12-2010 in as 234/2009 of additional district court, north paravur against the judgment & decree dated 08-09-2009 in os 705/2004 of munsiff court, north paravur appellants/appellants/defendants: 1 subran, aged 55, 2 kuttappan ,aged 45, s/o. sivaraman, 3 murukesan, aged 37, s/o. sivaraman, 4 shaju, aged 35, s/o. sivaraman, 5 ponni, aged 77, w/o. sivaraman, by advs. sri.k.narayanan (parur) sri.v.rajendran (perumbavoor) respondent/respondent/plaintiff: kairali, aged 62, edakkattuparambil, attupuram kara, puthenvelikara village -683579. r1 by adv. sri.p.k.sajeev this regular second appeal having been finally heard on 20.02.2020, the court on the same day delivered the following: rsa.no.1007 of 2011 2judgmentthe appellants and counsel remained absent.nobody represented the matter. appeal is of the year 2011. as such, this court has no other option, but to dismiss the appeal for nonprosecution. appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan, judge pm // true copy // pa to judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2020 / 1ST PHALGUNA, 1941 RSA.No.1007 OF 2011 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 13-12-2010 IN AS 234/2009 OF ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, NORTH PARAVUR AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 08-09-2009 IN OS 705/2004 OF MUNSIFF COURT, NORTH PARAVUR APPELLANTS/APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS: 1 SUBRAN, AGED 55, 2 KUTTAPPAN ,AGED 45, S/O. SIVARAMAN, 3 MURUKESAN, AGED 37, S/O. SIVARAMAN, 4 SHAJU, AGED 35, S/O. SIVARAMAN, 5 PONNI, AGED 77, W/O. SIVARAMAN, BY ADVS. SRI.K.NARAYANAN (PARUR) SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF: KAIRALI, AGED 62, EDAKKATTUPARAMBIL, ATTUPURAM KARA, PUTHENVELIKARA VILLAGE -683579. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.SAJEEV THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 20.02.2020, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RSA.No.1007 OF 2011 2

JUDGMENT

The appellants and counsel remained absent.

Nobody     represented          the    matter.      Appeal      is    of   the
year    2011.         As    such,      this       court   has    no    other
option,       but      to       dismiss    the       appeal      for       non

prosecution. Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN, JUDGE pm // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial