Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Joy Antony vs Princy

Joy Antony vs Princy

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Sep 18, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281813

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/792/2014
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Joy Antony

Respondent

Princy

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice p.somarajan friday, the 17th day of february 2023 / 28th magha, 1944 rfa no. 792 of 2014 (j) against the judgment & decree dated 18.09.2014 in os no.477/2011 of principal sub court, ernakulam appellant/1st defendant: joy antony, aged 54 years, nezhuvingal house, vidakkuzha kara, near nad gate, nad p.o., thrikkakara north village.by advs. sri.v.s.babu gireesan smt.preetha k john smt.preetha peter sri.roy thomas respondents/addl.plaintiffs & 2nd defendant: 1 princy, aged 38 years, w/o titus, puliyanedath house, glass factory colony, kalamassery. 2 francis, aged 68 years, s/o antony, velassery house, manjummal muri, eloor village. 3 alice enny, aged 45 years, niravathinal house, panangad p.o., ernakulam district. by advs. sri.john joseph(roy) sri.jefrin manuel this regular first appeal having come up for hearing on 17.02.2023, the court on the same day delivered the following: rfa no.792 of 2014 2judgmentappellant and counsel remained absent and there was no representation. hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- p.somarajan judge dmr/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023 / 28TH MAGHA, 1944 RFA NO. 792 OF 2014 (J) AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 18.09.2014 IN OS No.477/2011 OF PRINCIPAL SUB COURT, ERNAKULAM APPELLANT/1st DEFENDANT: JOY ANTONY, AGED 54 YEARS, NEZHUVINGAL HOUSE, VIDAKKUZHA KARA, NEAR NAD GATE, NAD P.O., THRIKKAKARA NORTH VILLAGE.

BY ADVS. SRI.V.S.BABU GIREESAN SMT.PREETHA K JOHN SMT.PREETHA PETER SRI.ROY THOMAS RESPONDENTS/ADDL.PLAINTIFFS & 2nd DEFENDANT: 1 PRINCY, AGED 38 YEARS, W/o TITUS, PULIYANEDATH HOUSE, GLASS FACTORY COLONY, KALAMASSERY. 2 FRANCIS, AGED 68 YEARS, S/o ANTONY, VELASSERY HOUSE, MANJUMMAL MURI, ELOOR VILLAGE. 3 ALICE ENNY, AGED 45 YEARS, NIRAVATHINAL HOUSE, PANANGAD P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS. SRI.JOHN JOSEPH(ROY) SRI.JEFRIN MANUEL THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR HEARING ON 17.02.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RFA No.792 of 2014 2

JUDGMENT

Appellant and counsel remained absent and there was no representation. Hence, the appeal will stand dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- P.SOMARAJAN JUDGE DMR/-

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial