Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mathew vs Joseph

Mathew vs Joseph

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 07, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281587

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP(C)/418/2017
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mathew

Respondent

Joseph

Excerpt

.....john (k) sri.domson j.vattakuzhy respondents: 1 joseph, aged 72 years, s/o.varghese, panamgodathu house, kanakkanthuruthy, vadakkencheery amsom desom, alathur taluk (died on 13/06/2016 but he alone is shown as the respondent in the impugned order) his wife and children namely elizabeth joseph, jogo george joseph, kurian joseph, jose p.joseph had filed i.a.no.1469 of 2016 in the final decree application and o.p.(c)no.418 of 2017 2 therefore they are shown as respondents 2 to 5 in this original petition, though their names do not find a place in the cause title of the impugned order dated 05/01/2017.2 elizabeth joseph, w/o.late joseph, panamgodathu house, 3 jogo george joseph, 4 kurian joseph, 5 jose p.joseph, sri.liju. m.p sri.sajan vargheese k. this op (civil) having been finally heard on 07.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: o.p.(c)no.418 of 2017 3k.babu, j.------------------------------------------- o.p.(c) no.418 of 2017 --------------------------------------------- dated this the 7th day of april, 2025judgmentthe learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the original petition. a memo to that effect has been filed. therefore, the original petition is dismissed as not pressed. sd/- k.babu judge vpk o.p.(c)no.418 of 2017 4 appendix of op(c) 418/2017 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 a true copy of the plaint filed by the 1st respondent dated 15/11/2007, munsiff's court, alathur. exhibit p2 a true copy of the decree in o.s.no.195 of 2007, munsiff's court, alathur. exhibit p3 a true copy of the commissioner's final report and plan dated exhibit p4 a true copy of affidavit and petition by the petitioner dated 21/11/2014. exhibit p5 a true copy of the objection by the 1st respondent dated 31/12/2014. exhibit p6 a true copy of the evidence of the advocate commissioner. exhibit p7 a true copy of the evidence of krishnankutty and affidavit. exhibit p8 a true copy of the order in.....

Full Judgment

O.P.(C)No.418 of 2017 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K. BABU MONDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 17TH CHAITHRA, 1947 OP(C) NO. 418 OF 2017 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 05.01.2017 IN IA NO.2099 OF 2014 IN OS NO.195 OF 2007 OF THE MUNSIFF COURT, ALATHUR PETITIONER: MATHEW, S/O.VARGHESE, PANANGODATHU HOUSE, VALIYAKULAM, CHETHIPUZHA, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER GEORGE JACOB, S/O.CHACKO, THAIPARAMBIL HOUSE, MADAPALLY VILLAGE, CHANGANASSERY TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY RESPONDENTS: 1 JOSEPH, AGED 72 YEARS, S/O.VARGHESE, PANAMGODATHU HOUSE, KANAKKANTHURUTHY, VADAKKENCHEERY AMSOM DESOM, ALATHUR TALUK (DIED ON 13/06/2016 BUT HE ALONE IS SHOWN AS THE RESPONDENT IN THE IMPUGNED ORDER) HIS WIFE AND CHILDREN NAMELY ELIZABETH JOSEPH, JOGO GEORGE JOSEPH, KURIAN JOSEPH, JOSE P.JOSEPH HAD FILED I.A.NO.1469 OF 2016 IN THE FINAL DECREE APPLICATION AND O.P.(C)No.418 of 2017 2 THEREFORE THEY ARE SHOWN AS RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5 IN THIS ORIGINAL PETITION, THOUGH THEIR NAMES DO NOT FIND A PLACE IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 05/01/2017.

2 ELIZABETH JOSEPH, W/O.LATE JOSEPH, PANAMGODATHU HOUSE, 3 JOGO GEORGE JOSEPH, 4 KURIAN JOSEPH, 5 JOSE P.JOSEPH, SRI.LIJU. M.P SRI.SAJAN VARGHEESE K. THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: O.P.(C)No.418 of 2017 3

K.BABU, J.

------------------------------------------- O.P.(C) No.418 of 2017 --------------------------------------------- Dated this the 7th day of April, 2025

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is not pressing the Original Petition. A memo to that effect has been filed. Therefore, the Original Petition is dismissed as not pressed. Sd/- K.BABU JUDGE VPK O.P.(C)No.418 of 2017 4 APPENDIX OF OP(C) 418/2017 PETITIONER EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE PLAINT FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15/11/2007, MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALATHUR. EXHIBIT P2 A TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE IN O.S.NO.195 OF 2007, MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALATHUR. EXHIBIT P3 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMMISSIONER'S FINAL REPORT AND PLAN DATED EXHIBIT P4 A TRUE COPY OF AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION BY THE PETITIONER DATED 21/11/2014. EXHIBIT P5 A TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 31/12/2014. EXHIBIT P6 A TRUE COPY OF THE EVIDENCE OF THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER. EXHIBIT P7 A TRUE COPY OF THE EVIDENCE OF KRISHNANKUTTY AND AFFIDAVIT. EXHIBIT P8 A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN I.A..NO.2099 OF 2014 IN O.S.NO.195 OF 2007 DATED 05/01/2017 MUNSIFF'S COURT, ALATHUR.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial