Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sivaram vs Anilkumar

Sivaram vs Anilkumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Dec 11, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281585

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/2915/2008
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sivaram

Respondent

Anilkumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 7th day of september 2021 / 16th bhadra, 1943 maca no. 2915 of 2008 against the order/judgment in opmv 975/2002 of additional motor accident claims tribunal , alappuzha appellant/petitioner: sivaram, s/o late palani rekha nivas, avalookkunnu.p.o,, alappuzha - 6. by adv sri.r.azad babu respondents/respondents: 1 anilkumar, s/o paramu, veliyil veedu, ward no.6,, mannanchery panchayat, alappuzha. 2 o.s mathew cheruvalli house, venmony.p.o,, chengannur. address of the 2 nd respondent is corrected as perorder dtd 3/12/19o.s mathew s/o thomas cheruvalli house ,venmany po chengannur. 689509 3 national insurance co. ltd. thiruvalla br, rep. by its manager. by advs. smt.deepa george sri.m.a.george this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 07.09.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following: maca no. 2915 of 2008 2 dated this the 7th day of september, 2021judgmentdespite the order dated 29.03.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2 nd respondent. the appeal is of the year 2008. it is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rmm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021 / 16TH BHADRA, 1943 MACA NO. 2915 OF 2008 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 975/2002 OF ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL , ALAPPUZHA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: SIVARAM, S/O LATE PALANI REKHA NIVAS, AVALOOKKUNNU.P.O,, ALAPPUZHA - 6. BY ADV SRI.R.AZAD BABU RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 ANILKUMAR, S/O PARAMU, VELIYIL VEEDU, WARD NO.6,, MANNANCHERY PANCHAYAT, ALAPPUZHA. 2 O.S MATHEW CHERUVALLI HOUSE, VENMONY.P.O,, CHENGANNUR. ADDRESS OF THE 2 ND RESPONDENT IS CORRECTED AS PER

ORDER DTD 3/12/19

O.S MATHEW S/O THOMAS CHERUVALLI HOUSE ,VENMANY PO CHENGANNUR. 689509 3 NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. THIRUVALLA BR, REP. BY ITS MANAGER. BY ADVS. SMT.DEEPA GEORGE SRI.M.A.GEORGE THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07.09.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: MACA NO. 2915 OF 2008 2 Dated this the 7th day of September, 2021

JUDGMENT

Despite the order dated 29.03.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the 2 nd respondent. The appeal is of the year 2008. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. SD/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rmm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial