Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Maniyan vs Binu

Maniyan vs BINU

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jul 11, 2025
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1281423

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/2501/2010
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Maniyan

Respondent

BINU

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias tuesday, the 8th day of february 2022 / 19th magha, 1943 against the order/judgment in op(mv) 1558/2004 of motor accident claims tribunal ,neyyattinkara appellant/petitioner: maniyan, s/o.raghavan, aged 31 years, karakkattuvila puthen veedu, nellivila, venniyoor desom,, venganoor village,, neyyatinkara taluk. by adv sri.g.s.reghunath respondents/respondents: 1 binu, s/o.palayan nadar, village,, neyyatinkara, thiruvananthapuram- 695 523. 2 the manager oriental insurance co. ltd.,, near bus stand, neyyatinkara.p.o,, trivandrum - 695121. by advs. sri.n.s.najeeb sri.p.jayasankar this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 08.02.2022, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgmentdespite the order dated 13.12.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. the appeal is of the year 2010. it is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- c.s.dias ma/08.02.2022 judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 / 19TH MAGHA, 1943 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OP(MV) 1558/2004 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER: MANIYAN, S/O.RAGHAVAN, AGED 31 YEARS, KARAKKATTUVILA PUTHEN VEEDU, NELLIVILA, VENNIYOOR DESOM,, VENGANOOR VILLAGE,, NEYYATINKARA TALUK. BY ADV SRI.G.S.REGHUNATH RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS: 1 BINU, S/O.PALAYAN NADAR, VILLAGE,, NEYYATINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 523. 2 THE MANAGER ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.,, NEAR BUS STAND, NEYYATINKARA.P.O,, TRIVANDRUM - 695121. BY ADVS. SRI.N.S.NAJEEB SRI.P.JAYASANKAR THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.02.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Despite the order dated 13.12.2021, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. The appeal is of the year 2010. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- C.S.DIAS ma/08.02.2022 JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial