Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Reji Kumar, vs the Area Manager,

Reji Kumar, vs The Area Manager,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1280403

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/13054/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Reji Kumar,

Respondent

The Area Manager,

Excerpt

.....to accept repayment of the entire outstanding amount of rs.33,29,493/- (rupees thirty three lakhs twenty nine thousand four hundred and ninety three only)along with any accrued interest, costs and charges from the petitioner in the following manner:-(i) the petitioner shall pay the outstanding amount of rs.33,29,493/-(rupees thirty three lakhs twenty nine thousand four hundred and ninety three only) along with any accrued interest, costs and charges in 18 equated monthly instalments;(ii) the first instalment shall be paid on or before 10.04.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the 10 th day of every succeeding months;(iii) in the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;(iv) in order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, allcoercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. considering the fact that considerably liberal instalments have been granted to the petitioner, it is made clear that no further application for extension of time will be considered under any circumstances. the writ petition is disposed of as above. sd/- gopinath p. judge dk appendix of wp(c) 13054/2025 petitioner exhibits exhibit-p1 a true copy of the notice given by the advocate commissioner dated 13.02.2025

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 PETITIONER: REJI KUMAR, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O. GANGADHARAN, CHEMBOTHARAYIL HOUSE, KUNNAMKARA P.O., KUNNAMKARA MURI, PERUNADU VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA BY ADVS. K.V.ANIL KUMAR RADHIKA S.ANIL NIJAZ JALEEL RESPONDENTS: 1 THE AREA MANAGER, KERALA BANK, (KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK), MADATHUMMOOZHY BRANCH, PERUNADU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA 2 THE BRANCH MANAGER, KERALA BANK(KERALA STATE CO-OPERATIVE BANK), MADATHUMMOOZHY BRANCH, PERUNADU P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA SMT. K.AMMINIKUTTY, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court challenging proceedings under the SARFAESI Act which have been initiated by the respondent bank for recovery of the amounts due from the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank

submits that though the loan in question is a housing loan, the tenure of the loan is to expire this year and therefore regularization cannot be considered. It is submitted that the outstanding amount as on today (28.03.2025) is Rs.33,29,493/- (Rupees thirty three lakhs twenty nine thousand four hundred and ninety three only). It was further submitted that though proceedings for recovery have been initiated, as a matter of indulgence, the respondent bank is willing to accept repayment of the outstanding amount in limited instalments.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to pay off the outstanding amount in some instalments.

4. Having regard to the circumstances of the case and the

submissions made as recorded above, I am of the view that the petitioner can be granted an opportunity to repay the outstanding amount along with any accrued interest, costs and charges in 18 instalments.

5. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the respondent

bank to accept repayment of the entire outstanding amount of Rs.33,29,493/- (Rupees thirty three lakhs twenty nine thousand four hundred and ninety three only)along with any accrued interest, costs and charges from the petitioner in the following manner:-

(i) The petitioner shall pay the outstanding amount of Rs.33,29,493/-

(Rupees thirty three lakhs twenty nine thousand four hundred and ninety three only) along with any accrued interest, costs and charges in 18 equated monthly instalments;

(ii) The first instalment shall be paid on or before 10.04.2025 and the subsequent instalments shall be paid on or before the 10 th day of every succeeding months;

(iii) In the event of default of any one instalment, the respondent bank shall be entitled to proceed in accordance with the law;

(iv) In order to enable the petitioner to repay the entire amounts, all

coercive proceedings shall be kept in abeyance. Considering the fact that considerably liberal instalments have been granted to the petitioner, it is made clear that no further application for extension of time will be considered under any circumstances. The writ petition is disposed of as above. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE DK APPENDIX OF WP(C) 13054/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit-P1 A TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE GIVEN BY THE ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER DATED 13.02.2025

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial