Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Thomas vs State of Kerala

Thomas vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1280393

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Crl.MC/3056/2025
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Thomas

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

crl.mc no. 3056 of 2025 1 2025:ker:26855in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c. jayachandran friday, the 28th day of march 2025 / 7th chaithra, 1947 crime no.13/2022 of vazhakulam police station, ernakulam against the order/judgment in cc no.883 of 2022 of judicial first class magistrate court - iii, muvattupuzha petitioner/accused: thomas aged 63 years s/o.mathai, thekkedath house, avoli kara, muvattupuzha village, ernakulam district., pin - 686670 by adv vivek venugopal respondents/state & defacto complainant:1 state of kerala represented by public prosecutor,high court of kerala, ernakulam, kochi., pin - 682031 2 simi antony aged 45 years w/o.cyriac, ettonnil house, moonilavu bhagom, vakakkad kara, meenachil taluk, kottayam district., pin - 686586 other present: sri. e.c. bineesh (pp) this criminal misc. case having come up for admission on 28.03.2025, the court on the same day passed the following: crl.mc no. 3056 of 2025 2 2025:ker:26855c. jayachandran, j.dated, this the 28th day of march, 2025orderthough the matter was argued for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, this crl.m.c. is not pressed. however, learned counsel would submit that he may be given the liberty to file necessary exemption application before the trial court, coupled with a direction to consider the same in accordance with law.2. in the circumstances, this crl.m.c. will standdismissed as withdrawn. the petitioner will be at liberty to file necessary application in accordance with the law seeking exemption. if any such application is filed, it will be up to the learned judge to take a call on such an application as per law. sd/- c. jayachandran judge ska

Full Judgment

CRL.MC NO. 3056 OF 2025 1 2025:KER:26855

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. JAYACHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CRIME NO.13/2022 OF Vazhakulam Police Station, Ernakulam AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CC NO.883 OF 2022 OF JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT - III, MUVATTUPUZHA PETITIONER/ACCUSED: THOMAS AGED 63 YEARS S/O.MATHAI, THEKKEDATH HOUSE, AVOLI KARA, MUVATTUPUZHA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT., PIN - 686670 BY ADV VIVEK VENUGOPAL RESPONDENTS/STATE & DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:

1 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI., PIN - 682031 2 SIMI ANTONY AGED 45 YEARS W/O.CYRIAC, ETTONNIL HOUSE, MOONILAVU BHAGOM, VAKAKKAD KARA, MEENACHIL TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT., PIN - 686586 OTHER PRESENT: SRI. E.C. BINEESH (PP) THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CRL.MC NO. 3056 OF 2025 2 2025:KER:26855

C. JAYACHANDRAN, J.

Dated, this the 28th day of March, 2025

ORDER

Though the matter was argued for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, this Crl.M.C. is not pressed. However, learned Counsel would submit that he may be given the liberty to file necessary exemption application before the trial court, coupled with a direction to consider the same in accordance with law.

2. In the circumstances, this Crl.M.C. will stand

dismissed as withdrawn. The petitioner will be at liberty to file necessary application in accordance with the law seeking exemption. If any such application is filed, it will be up to the learned Judge to take a call on such an application as per law. Sd/- C. JAYACHANDRAN JUDGE ska

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial