Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Krishnankutty vs Mohanakumar

Krishnankutty vs Mohanakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Nov 24, 2021
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1280225

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
MACA/380/2013
Subject
Motor Vehicles

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Motor Vehicles

Key legal issue
Motor Vehicles

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Krishnankutty

Respondent

Mohanakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr.justice c.s.dias wednesday, the 24th day of november 2021 / 3rd agrahayana, maca no. 380 of 2013 against the order/judgment in opmv 318/2005 of motor accident claims tribunal ,attingal, thiruvananthapuramappellant/s: krishnankutty pathiriyodu kaithakuzhi roadarikathu veedu velloorkonam, pacha po nedumangadu by advs. sri.r.t.pradeep sri.p.bijimon respondent/s: 1 mohanakumar mohana vilasam, pulimoodu, perila, chullimanoor p.o, nedumangadu 2 the manager united india insurance co ltd ash-har complex palace road, attingal 696101 by adv smt.raji t.bhaskar this motor accident claims appeal having come up for admission on 24.11.2021, the court on the same day delivered the following:c.s.dias, j.dated this the 24th day of november, 2021.judgmentdespite the order dated 12.8.2015, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. the appeal is of the year 2013. it is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. sd/- sks/24.11.2021 c.s.dias, judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, MACA NO. 380 OF 2013 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPMV 318/2005 OF MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL ,ATTINGAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPELLANT/S: KRISHNANKUTTY PATHIRIYODU KAITHAKUZHI ROADARIKATHU VEEDU VELLOORKONAM, PACHA PO NEDUMANGADU BY ADVS. SRI.R.T.PRADEEP SRI.P.BIJIMON RESPONDENT/S: 1 MOHANAKUMAR MOHANA VILASAM, PULIMOODU, PERILA, CHULLIMANOOR P.O, NEDUMANGADU 2 THE MANAGER UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO LTD ASH-HAR COMPLEX PALACE ROAD, ATTINGAL 696101 BY ADV SMT.RAJI T.BHASKAR THIS MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24.11.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S.DIAS, J.

Dated this the 24th day of November, 2021.

JUDGMENT

Despite the order dated 12.8.2015, the appellant has not taken steps to effect service of notice on the first respondent. The appeal is of the year 2013. It is assumed that the appellant is no longer desirous of prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default. Sd/- sks/24.11.2021 C.S.DIAS, JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial