Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Unnikrishnan B vs State of Kerala

Unnikrishnan B vs State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 10, 2025
~4 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1280043

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Bail Appl./4426/2025
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Unnikrishnan B

Respondent

State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....of alcohol in the parking area of tt restaurant, came in a car armed with dangerous weapons like dagger and iron rod formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and accused nos. 1 and 2 wrongfully restrained the owner of tt restaurant and the defacto complainant, and the 1 st accused inflicted a cut injury on the leg of the injured. the 2 nd accused beat the 1st informant on his left hand using an iron rod. when a staff of the hotel named ameer tried to intervene accused nos.3 to 5 fisted and kicked him. the owner of the shop had fallen down and the 1 st accused using the dagger attempted to cut on his neck which he evaded and if not have evaded he could have sustained serious injuries.4. heard the counsel for the petitioner and the public prosecutor. learned public prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application.5. after hearing both sides, i think this is nota fit case, in which orders u/s.482 bnss can be passed. at this stage the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will surrender before the investigating officer. the counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioner after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioner. i think that prayer can be allowed.considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions.1) the petitioner will surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks from today. 2) if the petitioner surrender before the investigating officer as directed above, the investigating officer is free to interrogate the petitioner. if arrest is recorded, the petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself. 3) the petitioner is free to file bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing him. if such a bail application.....

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/20TH CHAITHRA, 1947 BAIL APPL. NO. 4426 OF 2025 CRIME NO.219/2025 OF Town North Police Station, Palakkad PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

UNNIKRISHNAN B AGED 38 YEARS, S/O.BHASKARAN, PRIYA NIVAS, UTHUNGODE, THIRUNELLAYI, PALAKKAD DISTRICT., PIN - 678 004. BY ADV NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT-STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI., PIN - 682 031. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J -------------------------------- B.A.No.4426 of 2025 ------------------------------- Dated this the 10th day of April, 2025

ORDER

This Bail application is filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.

2. Petitioner is the 1st accused in Crime No.219 of 2025 of Town North Police Station, Palakkad.

The above case is registered against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Sections 329(3), 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 190, 189, 110, 191(2) and 191(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’).

3. The prosecution case is that 16.02.2025

at about 01:30 a.m., the accused persons who were having enmity towards the injured for the reason that he had earlier questioned consumption of alcohol in the parking area of TT Restaurant, came in a car armed with dangerous weapons like dagger and iron rod formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and accused Nos. 1 and 2 wrongfully restrained the owner of TT restaurant and the defacto complainant, and the 1 st accused inflicted a cut injury on the leg of the injured. The 2 nd accused beat the 1st informant on his left hand using an iron rod. When a staff of the hotel named Ameer tried to intervene accused Nos.3 to 5 fisted and kicked him. The owner of the shop had fallen down and the 1 st accused using the dagger attempted to cut on his neck which he evaded and if not have evaded he could have sustained serious injuries.

4. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the public Prosecutor. Learned Public Prosecutor seriously opposed the bail application.

5. After hearing both sides, I think this is not

a fit case, in which orders u/s.482 BNSS can be passed. At this stage the counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer. The counsel also submitted that there may be a direction to produce the petitioner after interrogation before the jurisdictional court and there may be a direction to the jurisdictional court to consider the bail application on the date of production of the petitioner. I think that prayer can be allowed.

Considering the submission of the counsel for the petitioner, this bail application is disposed of with the following directions.

1) The petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today. 2) If the petitioner surrender before the Investigating Officer as directed above, the Investigating Officer is free to interrogate the petitioner. If arrest is recorded, the petitioner shall be produced before the jurisdictional court on the date of surrender itself. 3) The petitioner is free to file bail application before the jurisdictional court at the time of producing him. If such a bail application is filed with advance copy to the prosecutor concerned, the jurisdictional court will consider that bail application in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders in it preferably on the date of filing of the same itself. 4) The Investigating Officer is free to file custody application, if necessary, at the time of producing the petitioner and if such application is filed, the jurisdictional court is free to pass appropriate orders in it also. Sd/- P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE

AMR APPENDIX OF BAIL APPL. 4426/2025 PETITIONER’S ANNEXURES Annexure 1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME NO.219/2025 OF TOWN NORTH POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DATED 16.02.2025

Annexure 2 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE COMMON ORDER

DATED 10.03.2025 IN CRL M.C.NO. SESSIONS, PALAKKAD

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial