Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

*P.H.James vs Florance and Another

*P.H.James vs Florance and Another

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Jan 27, 2020
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1279405

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/344/2011
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

*P.H.James

Respondent

Florance and Another

Excerpt

& fao.no.330 of 2011 against the order in i.a no.636/2011in os 60/2000 of sub court,neyyattinkara appellant/petitioner/second defendant: florance, d/o.kunjamma, aged 49 years, roadarikathu veedu, kottamam, arayoor p.o., chenkal village, neyyattinkara taluk,, thiruvananthapuram district. by adv. sri.c.m.stephen respondents/ counter petitioners/plaintiff & 1st defendant: 1 mohandas, s/o.pathrose, aged 48 years, mohan nivas, anducode desom, anducode, village, vilavamkode taluk, tamilnadu state - 614 704. 2 p.h.james, s/o.habel aged 60 years now residient at james nivas, kottamam,, arayoor p.o., chenkal village, neyyattinkara, taluk, thiruvananthapuram district.r1 by adv. sri.v.suresh r1 by adv. sri.g.sudheer r2 by adv. mathew scaria (no memo) heard on 23-01-2020, along with fao.344/2011, the court on & fao.no.344 of 2011 against the order in i.a 637/2011 in os 60/2000 dated 22- 10-2011 of sub court,neyyattinkara appellant/2nd respondent/1st defendant: james.p.h., s/o.habel, rodarikathu veedu neyyattinkara taluk, thiruvananthapuram-695122. by advs. sri.mathew skaria sri.k.j.josemon respondents/petitioner & 1st respondent/2nd defendant & plaintiff: 1 florance, rodarikathu veedu neyyatinkara taluk, thiruvananthapuram-695122.2 mohandas s/o.pathrose mohan nivas anducode desom, anducode village, vilavancode taluk, tamilnadu state, arumanai p.o.,, pin- 629151. r1 by adv. v suresh r1-2 by adv. c m stephen heard on 23-01-2020, along with fao.330/2011, the court on -3-judgmentharilal,j.the counsel representing the learned counsel for the appellant seeks time. since the f.a.os are of the year 2011, we are not inclined to adjourn these f.a os. hence these f.a.os will stand dismissed for default. sd/- k.harilal, judge ma/28/1/2020 sd/- c.s.dias, judge /true copy/ p.s to judge

Full Judgment

& FAO.No.330 OF 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A No.636/2011IN OS 60/2000 OF SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER/SECOND DEFENDANT: FLORANCE, D/O.KUNJAMMA, AGED 49 YEARS, ROADARIKATHU VEEDU, KOTTAMAM, ARAYOOR P.O., CHENKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK,, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.C.M.STEPHEN RESPONDENTS/ COUNTER PETITIONERS/PLAINTIFF & 1ST DEFENDANT: 1 MOHANDAS, S/O.PATHROSE, AGED 48 YEARS, MOHAN NIVAS, ANDUCODE DESOM, ANDUCODE, VILLAGE, VILAVAMKODE TALUK, TAMILNADU STATE - 614 704. 2 P.H.JAMES, S/O.HABEL AGED 60 YEARS NOW RESIDIENT AT JAMES NIVAS, KOTTAMAM,, ARAYOOR P.O., CHENKAL VILLAGE, NEYYATTINKARA, TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.V.SURESH R1 BY ADV. SRI.G.SUDHEER R2 BY ADV. MATHEW SCARIA (NO MEMO) HEARD ON 23-01-2020, ALONG WITH FAO.344/2011, THE COURT ON & FAO.No.344 OF 2011 AGAINST THE ORDER IN I.A 637/2011 IN OS 60/2000 DATED 22- 10-2011 OF SUB COURT,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/2ND RESPONDENT/1ST DEFENDANT: JAMES.P.H., S/O.HABEL, RODARIKATHU VEEDU NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695122. BY ADVS. SRI.MATHEW SKARIA SRI.K.J.JOSEMON RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & 1ST RESPONDENT/2ND DEFENDANT & PLAINTIFF: 1 FLORANCE, RODARIKATHU VEEDU NEYYATINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695122.

2 MOHANDAS S/O.PATHROSE MOHAN NIVAS ANDUCODE DESOM, ANDUCODE VILLAGE, VILAVANCODE TALUK, TAMILNADU STATE, ARUMANAI P.O.,, PIN- 629151. R1 BY ADV. V SURESH R1-2 BY ADV. C M STEPHEN HEARD ON 23-01-2020, ALONG WITH FAO.330/2011, THE COURT ON -3-

JUDGMENT

Harilal,J.

The counsel representing the learned counsel for the appellant seeks time. Since the F.A.Os are of the year 2011, we are not inclined to adjourn these F.A Os. Hence these F.A.Os will stand dismissed for default. Sd/- K.HARILAL, JUDGE ma/28/1/2020 Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE /True copy/ P.S to Judge

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial