Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Benny, vs State of Kerala,

BENNY, vs State of Kerala,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Apr 04, 2025
~6 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1279381

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/11741/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

BENNY,

Respondent

State of Kerala,

Excerpt

.....as directed above. the 3 rd respondent shall endeavor to consider the matter as directed above within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. sd/- gopinath p. judge scl/ appendix of wp(c) 11741/2025 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 the true copy of the final decree passed by third additional sub judge ernakulam in ia 5673/1997 in os 392/1981 exhibit p2 the true copy of the delivery receiptdated 08/11/2023 issued by the petitioners herein in ep no:782/2002 to the amin, district court ernakulam . exhibit p3 the true copy of the thandapper account of the property extending to 15 ares 54 m² mutated into the names of the petitioners pursuant to the final decree and deliveryexhibit p4 the true copy of the land tax receipt dated 29 june 2024 issued by the village office manakunnam to the petitioners exhibit p5 the true copy of the application dated under right to information act before excise range office thrippunithura exhibit p6 the true copy of the reply dated inspector of excise, ernakulam to the application made by the 8th petitioner exhibit p7 the true copy of the consent letter issued by the seventh respondent to the third respondent exhibit p8 the true copy of the reply dated to the 8th petitioner exhibit p9 a true copy of the complaint dated to various authorities under local self- government department, including the fourth respondent exhibit p10 a true copy of the complaint dated to 2nd and 3rd respondents respondent exhibits exhibit r7(a) true photocopy of the license issued for toddy shop no.20 dated 30.10.2023. exhibit r7(b) true photocopy of the agreement dated 28.05.2022 exhibit r7(c) true photocopy of the agreement dated 27.03.2006 exhibit r7(e) true photocopy of the caveato.p.no.202/2024 filed by sulabha and subin k.valsan before the sub court, ernakulam dated 05.08.2024 exhibit r7(d) true photocopy of the building tax paid before the udayamperoor grama panchayath for the year 2024-25 , dated 03.10.2024.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2025 / 14TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 11741 OF 2025 PETITIONER/S: 1 BENNY, AGED 64 YEARS S/OVELAPPAN, THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, SOUTH PARAVOOR P.O, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682307 2 RAJANI, AGED 61 YEARS D/O VELAPPAN THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 3 SAINA, AGED 54 YEARS D/OVELAPPAN THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 4 BIJU, AGED 55 YEARS S/O. VELAPPAN THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 5 REXONA, AGED 65 YEARS D/O VELAPPAN THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 6 PUSHPA SHAJI, AGED 28 YEARS W/O LATE SHAJI, THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 7 POOJA SHAJI, AGED 31 YEARS D/O LATE SHAJI, THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 8 SHINE SHAJI, AGED 36 YEARS S/O LATE SHAJI, THOPPIL HOUSE, PARUR MURI, MANAKUNNAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682307 BY ADVS. JOLLY JOHN LIZA MEGHAN CYRIAC C.S.RESHMI IRENE BABU MEHNAZ P. MOHAMMED RUBIN SHIBU RESPONDENT/S: 1 STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY TAXES,GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, MAIN BLOCK, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695001 2 EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE COMMISSIONERATE, VIKAS BHAVAN P.O., NANDAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695022 3 DEPUTY EXCISE COMMISSIONER, EXCISE DIVISION OFFICE,EXCISE ZONAL COMPLEX,KACHERIPPADY,ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682018 4 SECRETARY, UDAYAMPEROOR GRAMA PANCHAYATH, UDAYAMPEROOR, THRIPPUNITHURA, KERALA, PIN - 682307 5 JAYAPRAKASH AGE UNKNOWN TO PETITIONERS,S/O DAMODARAN, ARISSERIL HOUSE, VELLAASSERI, KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 6 PRASAD AGE UNKNWON TO PETITIONERS,S/O DAMODARAN, ARISSERIL HOUSE, VELLAASSERI, KADUTHURUTHY VILLAGE, VAIKOM TALUK, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, PIN - 7 ASHOKAN T.P AGE AND FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, THUNDIYIL HOUSE, CHAMBAKKARA, POONITHURA VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 682308

BY ADVS. K.P.MADHU M.G.KARTHIKEYAN M.G. NIREESH MATHEW(K/973/1994) OTHER PRESENT: SRI. SREEJITH V.S., GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have approached this Court praying inter alia for a direction to respondents 2 and 3 not to issue/renew any licence granted to a toddy shop situated in a land comprised in Re- Sy.No.669/7 (Old Sy.No.33/22) of Manakunnam Village without the express consent of the petitioners who claim to be the owners of the property.

2. It is the case of the petitioners that the party respondents

have fraudulently obtained licence for running a toddy shop upon the land belonging to the petitioners without consent of the petitioners. This suggestion of the learned counsel for the petitioners is stoutly opposed by the learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 7.

3. Heard the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents and the learned counsel appearing for the 4 th respondent Panchayat also.

4. The learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 7

would submit that respondents 5 to 7 have no objection in a direction being issued to the 3rd respondent to consider any objection that may be raised by the petitioners also while considering any application that may be filed by respondents 5 to 7 for renewal of licence for the year 2025-2026. This course of action is acceptable to the counsel for the petitioners.

5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the

petitioners, the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, the learned counsel appearing for the 4 th respondent Panchayat and the learned counsel appearing for respondents 5 to 7, I am of the opinion that this writ petition can be disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider any objection that may be raised by the petitioners and to provide an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners or their authorised representative as also to respondents 5 to 7 while considering any application for renewal of licence filed by respondents 5 to 7 in respect of the shop referred to herein above. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. I make it clear that I am not expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter. It is open to the 3 rd respondent to take a decision in the matter in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the parties as directed above. The 3 rd respondent shall endeavor to consider the matter as directed above within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Sd/- GOPINATH P. JUDGE Scl/ APPENDIX OF WP(C) 11741/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL DECREE PASSED BY THIRD ADDITIONAL SUB JUDGE ERNAKULAM IN IA 5673/1997 IN OS 392/1981 Exhibit P2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE DELIVERY RECEIPT

DATED 08/11/2023 ISSUED BY THE PETITIONERS HEREIN IN EP NO:782/2002 TO THE AMIN, DISTRICT COURT ERNAKULAM . Exhibit P3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE THANDAPPER ACCOUNT OF THE PROPERTY EXTENDING TO 15 ARES 54 M² MUTATED INTO THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS PURSUANT TO THE FINAL DECREE AND DELIVERY

Exhibit P4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT DATED 29 JUNE 2024 ISSUED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICE MANAKUNNAM TO THE PETITIONERS Exhibit P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT BEFORE EXCISE RANGE OFFICE THRIPPUNITHURA Exhibit P6 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED INSPECTOR OF EXCISE, ERNAKULAM TO THE APPLICATION MADE BY THE 8TH PETITIONER Exhibit P7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT LETTER ISSUED BY THE SEVENTH RESPONDENT TO THE THIRD RESPONDENT Exhibit P8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPLY DATED TO THE 8TH PETITIONER Exhibit P9 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED TO VARIOUS AUTHORITIES UNDER LOCAL SELF- GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, INCLUDING THE FOURTH RESPONDENT Exhibit P10 A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED TO 2ND AND 3RD RESPONDENTS RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R7(a) True photocopy of the license issued for toddy shop No.20 dated 30.10.2023. Exhibit R7(b) True photocopy of the agreement dated 28.05.2022 Exhibit R7(c) True photocopy of the agreement dated 27.03.2006 Exhibit R7(e) True photocopy of the Caveat

O.P.No.202/2024 filed by Sulabha and Subin K.Valsan before the Sub Court, Ernakulam dated 05.08.2024 Exhibit R7(d) True photocopy of the building tax paid before the Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath for the year 2024-25 , dated 03.10.2024.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial