Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Dr. Jagadeeswaran vs Nesamani

Dr. Jagadeeswaran vs Nesamani

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Apr 11, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1278698

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
FAO/43/2025
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dr. Jagadeeswaran

Respondent

Nesamani

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice syam kumar v.m. friday, the 11th day of april 2025/21st chaithra, 1947 against the order dated 20.02.2025 in cma no.7 of 2025 of assistant sessions court/sub court/commercial court,neyyattinkara arising out of the order in os no.763 of 2023 of principal munsiff court ,neyyattinkara appellant/petitioner in i.a. no.1/2025 in cma no.7/2025/plaintiff in o.s.no.763 of 2023dr. jagadeeswaran aged 57 years s/o. chellappan, navaneetham house, thirupurathoordesom, thirupuram p.o., thirupuram a.parvathi menon p.sanjay biju meenattoor p.k.muralykrishnan paul varghese (pallath) kiran narayanan rahul raj p. muhammed bilal.v.a meera r. menon respondents/respondents in i.a.no.1/2025 in c.m.a. 1 nesamani aged 69 years s/o marya michel nadar, s. r. bhavan, vlathikkuzhi, venkadanbudesom, kulathoor2 retnamma d/o maryammal, s. r. bhavan, vlathikkuzhi, neyyattinkara taluk, thiruvananthapuram., 3 soumya d/o retnamma, s. r. bhavan, vlathikkuzhi, 4 jagan raj s/o john rose, s. r. bhavan, vlathikkuzhi, g.sudheer-r1 to r4 r.harikrishnan (h-308)(k/000642/2013) this first appeal from orders having come up for admission on 11.04.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following:judgment============= the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has already been filed seeking permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to initiate appropriate action. permission granted. the fao is dismissed as withdrawn. sd/- syam kumar v.m. judge smm

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SYAM KUMAR V.M. FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2025/21ST CHAITHRA, 1947 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 20.02.2025 IN CMA NO.7 OF 2025 OF ASSISTANT SESSIONS COURT/SUB COURT/COMMERCIAL COURT,NEYYATTINKARA ARISING OUT OF THE ORDER IN OS NO.763 OF 2023 OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT ,NEYYATTINKARA APPELLANT/PETITIONER IN I.A. NO.1/2025 IN CMA NO.7/2025/PLAINTIFF IN O.S.NO.763 OF 2023

DR. JAGADEESWARAN AGED 57 YEARS S/O. CHELLAPPAN, NAVANEETHAM HOUSE, THIRUPURATHOORDESOM, THIRUPURAM P.O., THIRUPURAM A.PARVATHI MENON P.SANJAY BIJU MEENATTOOR P.K.MURALYKRISHNAN PAUL VARGHESE (PALLATH) KIRAN NARAYANAN RAHUL RAJ P. MUHAMMED BILAL.V.A MEERA R. MENON RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN I.A.NO.1/2025 IN C.M.A. 1 NESAMANI AGED 69 YEARS S/O MARYA MICHEL NADAR, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, VENKADANBUDESOM, KULATHOOR

2 RETNAMMA D/O MARYAMMAL, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, NEYYATTINKARA TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM., 3 SOUMYA D/O RETNAMMA, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, 4 JAGAN RAJ S/O JOHN ROSE, S. R. BHAVAN, VLATHIKKUZHI, G.SUDHEER-R1 TO R4 R.HARIKRISHNAN (H-308)(K/000642/2013) THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11.04.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

============= The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has already been filed seeking permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to initiate appropriate action. Permission granted. The FAO is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- SYAM KUMAR V.M. JUDGE smm

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial