Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Devikalyani B vs Sri.Saji

Devikalyani B vs Sri.Saji

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1278330

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Con.Case(C)/644/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Devikalyani B

Respondent

Sri.Saji

Excerpt

.....3judgmentin response to the contempt of court case, a memo has been submitted by the learned government pleader producing the order dated 22.03.2025, by which the application submitted by the petitioner is rejected. in such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order. sd/- ziyad rahman a.a. judge dg/29.3.25 coc.no.644/25 4 appendix of con.case(c) 644/2025 petitioner annexures annexure a1 the true copy of the relevant pages of the data bank of the property issued by the respondent annexure a2 the true copy of the report no.175/16dated 05.03.2016, mahazar, location sketch and a calculation sheet obtained by the petitioner under right to information act from the village officer, athiyannoor villageannexure a3 the true copy of the interim order dated 15.02.2017 in w.p.(c)no:5148/2017 of this hon’ble court annexure a4 the true copy of the judgment dated 20.10.2017 in w.p.(c)no:5148/2017 of this hon’ble court annexure a5 the true copy of the order no.kbn the respondent annexure a6 the certified copy of the judgment dated annexure a7 the true copy of the representation dated 26/10/2024 submitted by the petitioner before the respondent annexure a8 the true copy of the communication dated the rdo, thiruvananthapuram annexure a9 the copy of the judgment in contempt coc.no.644/25 5 case (civil) no.3054/2024 dated annexure a10 the true copy of the notice dated petitioner to the respondent

Full Judgment

COC.No.644/25 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 CON.CASE(C) NO.644 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED IN WP(C) NO.5896 OF 2022 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA PETITIONER:

DEVIKALYANI B., AGED 44 YEARS, W/O.NANDA KUMAR, AMBADI, S.K.NAGAR-202, ASRAMAM WEST, KOLLAM, PIN - 691 002. BY ADVS. B.MOHANLAL P.S.PREETHA ASWIN V. NAIR KARTHIK J SEKHAR ABIJITH M. AVANI NAIR JAYAPRABHA ARJUN PRAVEENA T. RESPONDENTS: SRI.SAJI, FATHER’S NAME AND AGED NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE AGRICULTURAL FIELD OFFICER, KRISHI BHAVAN, NEYYATTINKARA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, (THE CONVENER, LOCAL LEVEL MONITORING COMMITTEE

COC.No.644/25 2 CONSTITUTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE KERALA PADDY AND WET LAND ACT 2008), PIN - 695 121. Smt.Deepa.V, GOVERNMENT PLEADER THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: COC.No.644/25 3

JUDGMENT

In response to the contempt of court case, a memo has been submitted by the learned Government Pleader producing the order dated 22.03.2025, by which the application submitted by the petitioner is rejected. In such circumstances, this contempt of court case is closed without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to challenge the said order. Sd/- ZIYAD RAHMAN A.A. JUDGE DG/29.3.25 COC.No.644/25 4 APPENDIX OF CON.CASE(C) 644/2025 PETITIONER ANNEXURES Annexure A1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE DATA BANK OF THE PROPERTY ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT Annexure A2 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT NO.175/16

DATED 05.03.2016, MAHAZAR, LOCATION SKETCH AND A CALCULATION SHEET OBTAINED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT FROM THE VILLAGE OFFICER, ATHIYANNOOR VILLAGE

Annexure A3 THE TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 15.02.2017 IN W.P.(C)NO:5148/2017 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT Annexure A4 THE TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 20.10.2017 IN W.P.(C)NO:5148/2017 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT Annexure A5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.KBN THE RESPONDENT Annexure A6 THE CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED Annexure A7 THE TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26/10/2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT Annexure A8 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED THE RDO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM Annexure A9 THE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN CONTEMPT COC.No.644/25 5 CASE (CIVIL) NO.3054/2024 DATED Annexure A10 THE TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial