Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anoop vs the District Collector

ANOOP vs The District Collector

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277720

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/6186/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

ANOOP

Respondent

The District Collector

Excerpt

.....8 kamalamma thadathil puthenveettil north mynagappally by advs. k.siju-r6,r7 s.abhilash-r6,r7 anjana kannath-r6,r7 smt. devishree, gp this writ petition (civil) having been finally heard on 28.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following:t.r. ravi, j.w.p(c). no. 6186 of 2025 dated this the 28th day of march, 2025judgmentthe petitioners have preferred ext.p5 representation and the receipt of which is evident from ext.p4 before the 3rd respondent regarding the fixation of the boundaries of the property of the petitioners. the petitioners seek early disposal. in view of the limited prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on ext.p5, after hearing the petitioners at the earliest, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. sd/- t.r.ravi judge lek appendix of wp(c) 6186/2025 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the settlement deed no.1368/15/i of karunagappally sub registry dated 10.6.2015 exhibit p2 true copy of the land tax receipt with thandapper no.20050 of mynagappally village dated 20.09.2024 exhibit p3 true copy of the judgement in o.s.160/2015 dated 22.12.2021 on the file of munsiff - magistrate court, sasthamkotta exhibit p4 true copy of the receipt issued by the office of the 3rd respondent vide no.c1-809767/24 dated 25.9.2024 exhibit p5. true copy of the representation before the 1st respondent dated 30.09.2024 exhibit p6. true copy of the judgment in w.p.(c ) no.306/2022 dated 6.01.2022

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.R.RAVI FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 PETITIONERS: 1 ANOOP AGED 37 YEARS X/O IBRAHIMKUTTY,THADAVILAYIL VEEDU,NORTH MYNAGAPPALLY MURI,MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE,KUNNATHOOR TALUK,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690519 2 ANEESH AGED 35 YEARS S/O IBRAHIMKUTTY,THADAVILAYIL VEEDU,NORTH MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE,KUNNATHOOR TALUK,KOLLAM

BY ADV T.GOPALAKRISHNAN RESPONDENTS: 1 THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR CIVIL STATION KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691013 2 THE ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE CIVIL STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 691013 3 THE TAHSILDAR KUNNATHOOR TALUK.SASTHAMKOTTA P.O KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690521 4 THE TALUK SURVEYOR KUNNATHOOR TALUK,KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN - 690518 5 VILLAGE OFFICER MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE ,KUNNATHOOR TALUK,KOLLAM 6 SASIDHARAN 7 SALINI 8 KAMALAMMA THADATHIL PUTHENVEETTIL NORTH MYNAGAPPALLY BY ADVS. K.SIJU-R6,R7 S.ABHILASH-R6,R7 ANJANA KANNATH-R6,R7 SMT. DEVISHREE, GP THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAVI, J.

W.P(C). No. 6186 of 2025 Dated this the 28th day of March, 2025

JUDGMENT

The petitioners have preferred Ext.P5 representation and the receipt of which is evident from Ext.P4 before the 3rd respondent regarding the fixation of the boundaries of the property of the petitioners. The petitioners seek early disposal. In view of the limited prayer made, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5, after hearing the petitioners at the earliest, at any rate, within two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Sd/- T.R.RAVI JUDGE LEK APPENDIX OF WP(C) 6186/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE SETTLEMENT DEED NO.1368/15/I OF KARUNAGAPPALLY SUB REGISTRY DATED 10.6.2015 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LAND TAX RECEIPT WITH THANDAPPER NO.20050 OF MYNAGAPPALLY VILLAGE DATED 20.09.2024 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGEMENT IN O.S.160/2015 DATED 22.12.2021 ON THE FILE OF MUNSIFF - MAGISTRATE COURT, SASTHAMKOTTA Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT VIDE NO.C1-809767/24 DATED 25.9.2024 Exhibit P5. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 30.09.2024 Exhibit P6. TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN W.P.(C ) NO.306/2022 DATED 6.01.2022

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial