Ms/ Fooful Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax-II,

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 27, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277655

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1277655
Court: Kerala Orders High Court
Judge: Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar,Honourable Mr. Justice Easwaran S.
Decided On: Mar 27, 2025
Case Number: WA/682/2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ms/ Fooful Enterprises

Respondent

Assistant Commissioner of State Tax-II,

Excerpt

.....676 505. 3 inspecting asst. commissioner, com. taxes, kasargode - 671 121. 4 the commissioner, state goods and service tax dept. thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. 5 secretary, taxes department, government of kerala, secretariat, thiruvananthapuram - 695 001. w.a.no.682/2019 :: 2 ::6 central board of excise and customs, dept. of revenue, ministry of finance, govt. of india, new delhi - 110 001. by smt.resmitha ramachandran, government pleader by sri.p.r.sreejith, sc, central board of excise and customs this writ appeal having been finally heard on 27.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: w.a.no.682/2019 :: 3 ::judgmentdr. a.k. jayasankaran nambiar, j.the learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the writ appeal without prejudice to the right of the appellant to impugn ext.p5 in further proceedings under the central sales tax act. permission is granted, and the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right reserved above. we make it clear that if the appellant prefers a statutory appeal against ext.p5 order within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, then the appellate authority under the statute shall treat the appeal as one filed within time and proceed to consider and dispose of the same on merits. dr. a.k.jayasankaran nambiar easwaran s. prp/27/03/25

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE EASWARAN S. THURSDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH 2025/6TH CHAITHRA, 1947 W.A.NO.682 OF 2019 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT DATED 30.11.2018 IN W.P(C).NO.35341 OF 2018 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA APPELLANT (PETITIONER IN THE W.P.): MS.FOOFUL ENTERPRISES HILL PRODUCE DEALERS : UPPAR BAZAR, BADIYADUKKA, KASRGODE DIST. 671 551 BY P.SMAIL, PROPRIETOR.
BY ADV.SRI.PREMJIT NAGENDRAN BY ADV.SRI.P.RAGHUNATH RESPONDENTS (RESPONDENTS IN THE O.P.): 1 ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX-II, SPECIAL CIRCLE STATE GST DEPARTMENT, KASARGODE 676 505. 2 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS & SERVICES TAXES DEPT:, KASARGODE 676 505. 3 INSPECTING ASST. COMMISSIONER, COM. TAXES, KASARGODE - 671 121. 4 THE COMMISSIONER, STATE GOODS AND SERVICE TAX DEPT. THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. 5 SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001. W.A.NO.682/2019 :: 2 ::
6 CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS, DEPT. OF REVENUE, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVT. OF INDIA, NEW DELHI - 110 001. BY SMT.RESMITHA RAMACHANDRAN, GOVERNMENT PLEADER BY SRI.P.R.SREEJITH, SC, CENTRAL BOARD OF EXCISE AND CUSTOMS THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 27.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: W.A.NO.682/2019 :: 3 ::

JUDGMENT

Dr. A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

The learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Appeal without prejudice to the right of the appellant to impugn Ext.P5 in further proceedings under the Central Sales Tax Act. Permission is granted, and the Writ Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn without prejudice to the right reserved above. We make it clear that if the appellant prefers a statutory appeal against Ext.P5 order within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, then the Appellate Authority under the Statute shall treat the appeal as one filed within time and proceed to consider and dispose of the same on merits. DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR EASWARAN S. prp/27/03/25

Same Court & Year Kerala Orders · 2025 Same Parties Ms/ Fooful Enterprises vs Assistant Commissioner of State Tax... Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Honourable Dr. Justice a.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar,Honourable Mr...