Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suby Chacko vs the State of Kerala

Suby Chacko vs The State of Kerala

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 25, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277488

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP(C)/4632/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suby Chacko

Respondent

The State of Kerala

Excerpt

.....to direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to harass the petitioners by summoning them to the police station unnecessarily.2. when the writ petition came up for consideration on 13.02.2025 this court passed the following order: “the learned government pleader takes notice for the respondents. the competent among the respondents shall file counter affidavit.2. the respondents are directed not to summon the petitioners to the police station without issuing a notice under section 35(3) of the bnss”.3. heard; the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned government pleader.4. on a consideration of the facts and the materialson record, i am of the view that a quietus can be given to the writ petition, by making the interim order dated 13.02.2025 absolute. in the said circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of by making the interim order dated 13.02.2025 absolute. the writ petition is ordered accordingly. sd/- c.s.dias, judge rkc/25.03.25 appendix of wp(c) 4632/2025 petitioner exhibits exhibit p1 true copy of the causality ticket dated02.02.2025 numbered as 3232 issued in the name of the 1st petitioner by mallappally block panchayat taluk headquarters hospital, mallappallyexhibit p2 true copy of the complaint dated 30.08.2024 preferred by mrs. preethy mathew before the chief minister and the home minister exhibit p3 true copy of the amended writ petition numbered as w.p. (c) no. 33775/ 2024 on the files of the honourable high court of kerala exhibit p4 true copy of the cmp numbered as 11660/2024 dated 13.12.2024 preferred by mrs. preethy mathew on the files of the hon’ble jfcm- iii, kottayam

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS TUESDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 4TH CHAITHRA, 1947 PETITIONER/S: 1 SUBY CHACKO AGED 48 YEARS SON OF SRI. BABY CHACKO, THUNDIYAMKULATHU, KALLOOPPARA, THURUTHICAUD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, KERALA,, PIN - 68959 2 MINI JOSEPH AGED 45 YEARS WIFE OF SUBY CHACKO, THUNDIYAMKULATHU, KALLOOPPARA, THURUTHICAUD, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, KERALA, PIN - BY ADVS. LUKE J CHIRAYIL JACOB VICTOR NAVANEETH KRISHNAN P.K. ZAINUDHEEN P. ARAVIND R. NAIR RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA, PIN - 695001

2 THE DISTRICT POLICE CHIEF KOTTAYAM DISTRICT, KOTTAYAM, KERALA,, PIN - 686001 3 THE SHO 4 THE SI OF POLICE 5 THE ASI OF POLICE OTHER PRESENT: SRI AJITH VISWANATHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

C.S.DIAS, J.

--------------------------------------- WP(C) No.4632 OF 2025 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 25th day of March, 2025

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed to direct the respondents 3 to 5 not to harass the petitioners by summoning them to the police station unnecessarily.

2. When the writ petition came up for consideration on 13.02.2025 this Court passed the following order: “The learned Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents. The competent among the respondents shall file counter affidavit.

2. The respondents are directed not to summon the petitioners to the police station without issuing a notice under Section 35(3) of the BNSS”.

3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader.

4. On a consideration of the facts and the materials

on record, I am of the view that a quietus can be given to the writ petition, by making the interim order dated 13.02.2025 absolute. In the said circumstances, the writ petition is disposed of by making the interim order dated 13.02.2025 absolute. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc/25.03.25 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 4632/2025 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE CAUSALITY TICKET DATED

02.02.2025 NUMBERED AS 3232 ISSUED IN THE NAME OF THE 1ST PETITIONER BY MALLAPPALLY BLOCK PANCHAYAT TALUK HEADQUARTERS HOSPITAL, MALLAPPALLY

Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 30.08.2024 PREFERRED BY MRS. PREETHY MATHEW BEFORE THE CHIEF MINISTER AND THE HOME MINISTER Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE AMENDED WRIT PETITION NUMBERED AS W.P. (C) NO. 33775/ 2024 ON THE FILES OF THE HONOURABLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Exhibit P4 TRUE COPY OF THE CMP NUMBERED AS 11660/2024 DATED 13.12.2024 PREFERRED BY MRS. PREETHY MATHEW ON THE FILES OF THE HON’BLE JFCM- III, KOTTAYAM

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial