Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Shimna Krishnan vs Ajayakumar

Shimna Krishnan vs Ajayakumar

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Orders Decided Mar 26, 2025
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277435

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
OP (FC)/55/2025
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shimna Krishnan

Respondent

Ajayakumar

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mr. justice devan ramachandran & the honourable mrs. justice m.b. snehalatha wednesday, the 26th day of march 2025 / 5th chaithra, 1947 op (fc) no. 55 of 2025 against the order dated 21.12.2024 in i.a.4/2024 in op no.934 of 2022 of family court, thalassery petitioners/respondents/petitioners: 1 shimna krishnan, aged 33 years w/o ajayakumar, palayatil(h), parambathekandy, aralam p.o, kannur district, pin - 670704 2 ananya, (minor), aged 11 years d/o ajayakumar, represented by mother shimna krishnan palayatil(h),parambathekandy, aralam p.o,kannur district, pin - 670704 by advs. deepak raj gouthami respondent/petitioner/respondent: ajayakumar, aged 51 years, s/o kunhikannan, atholi kunhiparayil(h), vannathimoola, manantheri p.o kannur district, represented by power of attorney holder a.k jayalakshmi, d/o kunhikutty, aged 60 years, atholi kunhiparayil(h), vannathimoola, manantheri p.o kannur district, pin - 670643 this op (family court) having been spoken to on 26.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: op(fc) 55/25.judgmentdevan ramachandran, j.when this matter was called today, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this original petition, with liberty being reserved to his clients to file a fresh one, challenging all the orders as are involved in ext.p3. consequently, this original petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioners. devan ramachandran m.b. snehalatha rr

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 OP (FC) NO. 55 OF 2025 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 21.12.2024 IN I.A.4/2024 IN OP NO.934 OF 2022 OF FAMILY COURT, THALASSERY PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 SHIMNA KRISHNAN, AGED 33 YEARS W/O AJAYAKUMAR, PALAYATIL(H), PARAMBATHEKANDY, ARALAM P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670704 2 ANANYA, (MINOR), AGED 11 YEARS D/O AJAYAKUMAR, REPRESENTED BY MOTHER SHIMNA KRISHNAN PALAYATIL(H),PARAMBATHEKANDY, ARALAM P.O,KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670704 BY ADVS. DEEPAK RAJ GOUTHAMI RESPONDENT/PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: AJAYAKUMAR, AGED 51 YEARS, S/O KUNHIKANNAN, ATHOLI KUNHIPARAYIL(H), VANNATHIMOOLA, MANANTHERI P.O KANNUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER A.K JAYALAKSHMI, D/O KUNHIKUTTY, AGED 60 YEARS, ATHOLI KUNHIPARAYIL(H), VANNATHIMOOLA, MANANTHERI P.O KANNUR DISTRICT, PIN - 670643 THIS OP (FAMILY COURT) HAVING BEEN SPOKEN TO ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: OP(FC) 55/25

.JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

When this matter was called today, learned counsel for the petitioners sought permission to withdraw this Original Petition, with liberty being reserved to his clients to file a fresh one, challenging all the orders as are involved in Ext.P3. Consequently, this Original Petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn; with the afore requested liberty being reserved to the petitioners. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN M.B. SNEHALATHA RR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial