Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Vasudevan vs Vijayan

Vasudevan vs Vijayan

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided May 18, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1277001

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Kerala High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/96/2005
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vasudevan

Respondent

Vijayan

Excerpt

in the high court of kerala at ernakulampresent the honourable mrs. justice shircy v. thursday, the 22nd day of august 2019 / 31st sravana, 1941 rfa.no.96 of 2005 against the judgment and decree in os 336/1998 dated 29-08-2003 of additional sub court, irinjalakuda appellant/plaintiffs: 1 vasudevan, s/o. thaiparambath subramanian, lokamaleswaram village,kodungallur taluk. 2 binoy, s/o. vasudevan rep.by vasudevan, do. by advs. sri.renjith thampan (sr.) smt.p.a.anitha respondents/defendants:1 vijayan, s/o. cheruleyil chowryedath kumaran, chappara desom,, pullut village, kodungallur taluk. 2 vinoj, s/o. vijayan -do-. -do-. 3 vinesh s/o. -do-. -do-. 4 ramakrishnan, s/o. thooprath appu thazhekkad village, mukundapuram taluk. 5 ammini, w/o. chirayirunmel kunjiraman thazhekkad village,- do-. taluk. 6 ratnavally, d/o. kunjiraman, do. c.c.38/3006 a (3), s/o. j. ramanadha pai, ews 748, elamkulam gandhinagar. 7 gopinathan, s/o. do. do. r1 to r3- by adv. sri.k.s.bharathan this regular first appeal having been finally heard on22.08.2019, the court on the same day delivered the following: rfa.no.96 of 2005 2judgmentno representation for the appellants. there was no representation for the appellants on the three previous posting dates also. hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. sd/- shircy v. smm judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE SHIRCY V. THURSDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2019 / 31ST SRAVANA, 1941 RFA.No.96 OF 2005 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN OS 336/1998 DATED 29-08-2003 OF ADDITIONAL SUB COURT, IRINJALAKUDA APPELLANT/PLAINTIFFS: 1 VASUDEVAN, S/O. THAIPARAMBATH SUBRAMANIAN, LOKAMALESWARAM VILLAGE,KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 2 BINOY, S/O. VASUDEVAN REP.BY VASUDEVAN, DO. BY ADVS. SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN (SR.) SMT.P.A.ANITHA RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS:

1 VIJAYAN, S/O. CHERULEYIL CHOWRYEDATH KUMARAN, CHAPPARA DESOM,, PULLUT VILLAGE, KODUNGALLUR TALUK. 2 VINOJ, S/O. VIJAYAN -DO-. -DO-. 3 VINESH S/O. -DO-. -DO-. 4 RAMAKRISHNAN, S/O. THOOPRATH APPU THAZHEKKAD VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK. 5 AMMINI, W/O. CHIRAYIRUNMEL KUNJIRAMAN THAZHEKKAD VILLAGE,- DO-. TALUK. 6 RATNAVALLY, D/O. KUNJIRAMAN, DO. C.C.38/3006 A (3), S/O. J. RAMANADHA PAI, EWS 748, ELAMKULAM GANDHINAGAR. 7 GOPINATHAN, S/O. DO. DO. R1 to R3- BY ADV. SRI.K.S.BHARATHAN THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON

22.08.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: RFA.No.96 OF 2005 2

JUDGMENT

No representation for the appellants. There was no representation for the appellants on the three previous posting dates also. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- SHIRCY V. smm JUDGE

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial