Somasundaran vs Sunitha K.P

Type Court Judgment Court Kerala Decided Mar 28, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1276989

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1276989
Court: Kerala High Court
Judge: Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran,Honourable Mrs. Justice M.B. Snehalatha
Decided On: Mar 28, 2025
Case Number: Mat.Appeal/245/2025
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Somasundaran

Respondent

Sunitha K.P

Excerpt

.....house, thanaloor amsom & desom, thanalur p.o., tirur, malappuram district, pin - 676307. this matrimonial appeal having come up for admission on 28.03.2025, the court on the same day delivered the following: -3-judgmentdevan ramachandran, j.when this matter was considered on 14.03.2025, we issued the following order:sri.p.t.sheejish - learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that his client was incapacitated in filing an appeal as explained by him in the affidavit in support of c.m.application.no.1/2025; and further that the property involved need not have been sold fully, but only a part. obviously, if the appellant's case is as before, then he must prove his bonafides by depositing the entire amount before he can seek any indulgence from this court. sri.p.t.sheejish sought two days time to confer with his client. post on 18.03.2025.2. thereafter, on 24.03.2025 again, we passed an order, which is to the following -4effect: read order dated 14.03.2025. there is no appearance for the appellant, nor have he reported any deposit. post on 26.03.2025.3. obviously, even today, there is no appearance for the appellant.4. we are, therefore, of the firm view that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this appeal. this appeal is thus dismissed for default. devan ramachandran judge m.b.snehalatha akv judge

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE M.B. SNEHALATHA FRIDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 7TH CHAITHRA, 1947 AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 18.11.2015 IN OP NO.303/2015, FAMILY COURT, TIRUR APPELLANT/RESPONDENT: SOMASUNDARAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O. AYYAPPAN, MANNATH HOUSE, ALATHIYOOR AMSOM, THANDILAKKARA DESOM, ALATHIYOOR P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676102. BY ADVS. P.T.SHEEJISH P.SREERAM HARIKIRAN A.ABDUL RAHMAN (A-1917) PARVATHY S. MANOJ AMRITA SAFAL M. YOOSUF SAFWAN T. AJMAL PARVATHI RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS: 1 SUNITHA K.P, AGED 48 YEARS, D/O. VELAYUDHAN, -2- 2 SANOOP, AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. SOMASUNDARAN, KOLLAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, THANALUR AMSOM & DESOM, 3 SNEHA, AGED 25 YEARS, D/O. SOMASUNDARAN, 4 SOORAJ SUNDAR, AGED 20 YEARS, S/O. SOMASUNDARAN, KOLLAPPARAMBIL HOUSE, THANALOOR AMSOM & DESOM, THANALUR P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676307. THIS MATRIMONIAL APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: -3-

JUDGMENT

Devan Ramachandran, J.

When this matter was considered on 14.03.2025, we issued the following order:

Sri.P.T.Sheejish - learned counsel for the appellant, submitted that his client was incapacitated in filing an appeal as explained by him in the affidavit in support of C.M.Application.No.1/2025; and further that the property involved need not have been sold fully, but only a part. Obviously, if the appellant's case is as before, then he must prove his bonafides by depositing the entire amount before he can seek any indulgence from this Court. Sri.P.T.Sheejish sought two days time to confer with his client. Post on 18.03.2025.

2. Thereafter, on 24.03.2025 again, we passed an order, which is to the following -4effect: Read order dated 14.03.2025. There is no appearance for the appellant, nor have he reported any deposit. Post on 26.03.2025.

3. Obviously, even today, there is no appearance for the appellant.

4. We are, therefore, of the firm view that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting this Appeal. This Appeal is thus dismissed for default. DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN JUDGE M.B.SNEHALATHA akv JUDGE

Same Court & Year Kerala · 2025 Same Parties Somasundaran vs Sunitha K.P Same Subject Education Same Judge Honourable Mr. Justice Devan Ramachandran,Honourable Mrs. Jus...