Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Amit Dixit vs All India Council for Technical Education (Aicte) & Ors.

Amit Dixit vs All India Council for Technical Education (Aicte) & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 03, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1273505

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/18354/2025
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Amit Dixit

Respondent

All India Council for Technical Education (Aicte) & Ors.

Advocate Ms. Pearl Sharma, Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Komal Yadav, Mr. Prince Yada, Ms. Ankita Yadav

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 18354/2025 amit dixit .....petitioner through: none.versusall india council for technical education (aicte) & ors. .....respondents through: ms. pearl sharma, adv. for aicte mr. om prakash, mr. chandresh pratap, ms. swati mishra, ms. komal yadav, mr. prince yada, ms. ankita yadav, advs. for r-2coram:hon'ble mr. justice jasmeet singhorder% 03.02.20261. there is nobody appearing on behalf of the petitioner today.2. even as per the order dated 03.12.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought an adjournment.3. hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. jasmeet singh, j february 3, 2026/spthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 11/02/2026 at 11:39:45

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 18354/2025 AMIT DIXIT .....Petitioner Through: None.

versus

ALL INDIA COUNCIL FOR TECHNICAL EDUCATION (AICTE) & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pearl Sharma, Adv. for AICTE Mr. Om Prakash, Mr. Chandresh Pratap, Ms. Swati Mishra, Ms. Komal Yadav, Mr. Prince Yada, Ms. Ankita Yadav, Advs. for R-2

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH

ORDER

% 03.02.2026

1. There is nobody appearing on behalf of the petitioner today.

2. Even as per the order dated 03.12.2025, the learned counsel for the petitioner had sought an adjournment.

3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. JASMEET SINGH, J FEBRUARY 3, 2026/sp

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 11/02/2026 at 11:39:45

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial