Dhanayya S Math vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Dharwad Decided Apr 25, 2025

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1270334

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1270334
Court: Karnataka Dharwad High Court
Judge: Jyoti Mulimani
Decided On: Apr 25, 2025
Case Number: WP/102025/2025
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Dhanayya S Math

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....high knnl, grbcc div.no.2, court of hidkal dam, belagavi-591 107. karnataka3. the executive engineer, knnl, grbcc div. no.1, hidkal dam, belagavi-591 107.4. chief engineer, knnl, irrigation north division, belagavi-590 001.5. the managing directorknnl, 4th floor, coffee board building no.1, -2- dr. b.r. ambedkar veedhi, bengaluru-560 001. … respondents (by smt. kirtilata r. patil, hcgp for r1; sri. shivaraj c. bellakki, advocate for r2-r5) this writ petition is filed under article 226 of the constitution of india, seeking certain reliefs. this writ petition is listed for preliminary hearing in ‘b’ group, this day, an order is made as under:oral ordersri.manjunath a.karigannavar., counsel for the petitioner, smt.kirtilata r.patil., hcgp for respondent no.1 and sri.shivaraj c.bellakki., counsel for respondents 2 to 5 have appeared in person.2. the captioned writ petition is filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondent no.2 to consider the3. heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care.4. counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondent no.2 to consider the -3- hcgp submits that an appropriate order may be passed.5. a mandamus is ordered directing respondent no.2to consider the representation dated:19.11.2024 vide annexure-g in accordance with the law, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered.6. resultantly, the writ petition is disposed of. this court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. sd/- (jyoti mulimani) judge mrp/rh list no.: 1 sl no.: 75

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102025 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: DHANAYYA S. MATH, 45 YEARS, CLASS-I KPWD CONTRACTOR, DANESHWARI NILAYA, LINGAD GUDI ROAD, CHALUKYA NAGAR, VIJAYANAGAR-586 103. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. MANJUNATH A. KARIGANNAVAR, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,

BY ITS SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by 2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH KNNL, GRBCC DIV.NO.2, COURT OF HIDKAL DAM, BELAGAVI-591 107. KARNATAKA

3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KNNL, GRBCC DIV. NO.1, HIDKAL DAM, BELAGAVI-591 107.

4. CHIEF ENGINEER, KNNL, IRRIGATION NORTH DIVISION, BELAGAVI-590 001.

5. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

KNNL, 4TH FLOOR, COFFEE BOARD BUILDING NO.1, -2- DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SRI. SHIVARAJ C. BELLAKKI, ADVOCATE FOR R2-R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

Sri.Manjunath A.Karigannavar., counsel for the petitioner, Smt.Kirtilata R.Patil., HCGP for respondent No.1 and Sri.Shivaraj C.Bellakki., counsel for respondents 2 to 5 have appeared in person.

2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the

3. Heard the arguments and perused the writ papers with care.

4. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a mandamus may be ordered directing respondent No.2 to consider the -3- HCGP submits that an appropriate order may be passed.

5. A Mandamus is ordered directing respondent No.2

to consider the representation dated:19.11.2024 vide Annexure-G in accordance with the law, within eight weeks from the receipt of certified copy of this order, if not already considered.

6. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP/RH LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 75

Same Court & Year Karnataka Dharwad · 2025 Same Parties Dhanayya S Math vs State of Karnataka Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Jyoti Mulimani