Rakesh vs State of Nct of Delhi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Jun 12, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1266249

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1266249
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna
Decided On: Jun 12, 2026
Case Number: CRL.M.C./4407/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rakesh

Advocate Mr. Amit Chadha, Mr. Pardeep, Ms. Saumya Dwivedi, Mr. Sanjog Singh, Mr. Harjas Singh

Respondent

State of Nct of Delhi

Advocate Mr. Aman Usman, Mr. Manvendra Yadav

Excerpt

.....mr. sanjog singh and mr. harjas singh, advocatesversusstate of nct of delhi .....respondent through: mr. aman usman & mr. manvendra yadav, app for the state.coram:hon'ble ms. justice neena bansal krishnaorder% 12.06.20261. petition under section 528 of bnss has been filed on behalf of thepetitioner for setting aside order dated 03.06.2026 passed by learned sessions court, delhi, whereby non-bailable warrants have been issued against the petitioner in fir no.0026/2026 and application filed by the petitioner seeking cancelation / recall of non-bailable warrants has been dismissed.2. learned senior advocate for the petitioner submits that notice hadbeen served upon the petitioner, has been duly replied by his wife. it is submitted that petitioner was out of town and was unwell and had sought time. however, non-bailable warrants got issued against him, only for the purpose of securing his presence to join investigations.3. petitioner is willing to appear before the investigating officer on 13.06.2026 at 11:00 am to join the investigations.4. learned app for the state appears on advance notice, accepts noticeand submits that petitioner’s remedy does not lie by way of cancellation of non-bailable warrants. the proceedings under sections 82 and 84 have also been initiated and only remedy available to the petitioner is to seek bail, in accordance with law. submissions heard and record perused.5. as has been submitted by learned senior advocate for the petitionerthat non-bailable warrants were issued only for the purpose of ensuring that petitioner joins investigations. he further submits that petitioner shall join the investigations immediately on 13.06.2026 at 11:00 am.6. investigating officer is at liberty to investigate and interrogate the petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law, including arrest, if grounds for arrest are made out.7. with the aforesaid observations, present petition along with pending applications is disposed of. neena.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.M.C. 4407/2026, CRL.M.A. 17987/2026 & 17988/2026 RAKESH .....Petitioner Through: Mr Amit Chadha, Senior Advocate alongwith Mr. Pardeep, Ms. Saumya Dwivedi, Mr. Sanjog Singh and Mr. Harjas Singh, Advocates
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman & Mr. Manvendra Yadav, APP for the State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA

ORDER

% 12.06.2026

1. Petition under Section 528 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the

Petitioner for setting aside Order dated 03.06.2026 passed by learned Sessions Court, Delhi, whereby Non-Bailable Warrants have been issued against the Petitioner in FIR No.0026/2026 and Application filed by the Petitioner seeking cancelation / recall of Non-Bailable Warrants has been dismissed.

2. Learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner submits that Notice had

been served upon the Petitioner, has been duly replied by his wife. It is submitted that Petitioner was out of town and was unwell and had sought time. However, Non-Bailable Warrants got issued against him, only for the purpose of securing his presence to join investigations.

3. Petitioner is willing to appear before the Investigating Officer on 13.06.2026 at 11:00 AM to join the investigations.

4. Learned APP for the State appears on advance Notice, accepts Notice

and submits that Petitioner’s remedy does not lie by way of cancellation of Non-Bailable Warrants. The Proceedings under Sections 82 and 84 have also been initiated and only remedy available to the Petitioner is to seek Bail, in accordance with law. Submissions heard and record perused.

5. As has been submitted by learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioner

that Non-Bailable Warrants were issued only for the purpose of ensuring that Petitioner joins investigations. He further submits that Petitioner shall join the investigations immediately on 13.06.2026 at 11:00 AM.

6. Investigating Officer is at liberty to investigate and interrogate the Petitioner and proceed further in accordance with law, including arrest, if grounds for arrest are made out.

7. With the aforesaid observations, present Petition along with pending Applications is disposed of. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 12, 2026/R

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Rakesh vs State of Nct of Delhi Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Neena Bansal Krishna