Powerschool Group LLC vs Academicae Ai Technology Private Limited and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 29, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1265907

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1265907
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela
Decided On: May 29, 2026
Case Number: CS(COMM)/633/2026
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Powerschool Group LLC

Advocate Mr. Urfee Roomi, Ms. Janaki Arun, Ms. Anuja Chaudhury, Ms. Angela Arora

Respondent

Academicae Ai Technology Private Limited and Anr

Advocate Mr. Chandra Kant

Excerpt

.....the plaintiff shall have no objection. as such, he states that the suit may be decreed in terms of prayer at para 66 (a), (b), (c) & (d) of the plaint suit.5. mr. chandra kant, learned counsel appearing for defendant no.1 alsostates that so far as sub-para (d) of para 66 of the prayer of the plaint is concerned, the defendant no.1 shall withdraw its pending trade mark application bearing nos.7210390 and 7210391 in classes 41 and 42, respectively for the ps power school (device mark)/ within four weeks from date.6. on account of the aforesaid statement, mr. roomi, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff, on instructions, states that the prayer so far as costs and damages is concerned, they are being given up.7. in terms of the aforesaid, binding the defendant to the aforesaid statement, the decree sheet be drawn up in terms of sub-paras (a), (b), (c) & (d) of para 66 of the plaint suit.8. the court fees shall be refunded to the plaintiff under the provisions of section 16 of the court fees, 1870 read with court fees (delhi amendment), 2026 upon completion of all the formalities, as per rules.9. noting the above, the suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all the pending applications. tushar rao gedela, j may 29, 2026 kct

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CS(COMM) 633/2026, I.A. 15612/2026, I.A. 15613/2026, I.A. POWERSCHOOL GROUP LLC .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Urfee Roomi, Ms. Janaki Arun, Ms. Anuja Chaudhury and Ms. Angela Arora, Advocates.
versus
ACADEMICAE AI TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR .....Defendants Through: Mr. Chandra Kant, Advocate for D-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA

ORDER

% 29.05.2026 CS(COMM) 633/2026

1. Issue summons.

2. Mr. Chandra Kant, learned counsel enters appearance and accepts summons on behalf of the defendants and waives off the issuance of formal summons.

3. After some arguments, Mr. Kant, learned counsel appearing for the

defendants states that the defendant no.1 is a Start-Up company and does not want any adverse order against it. He states that since it is a beginner, he has no difficulty in case they are permitted to use the mark ‘APS Academicae AI School’ instead of “APS Academicae Power Schools”.

4. Mr. Roomi, learned counsel for the plaintiff states, on instructions, that

so far as usage of ‘APS Academicae AI School’ is concerned, the plaintiff shall have no objection. As such, he states that the suit may be decreed in terms of prayer at para 66 (a), (b), (c) & (d) of the plaint suit.

5. Mr. Chandra Kant, learned counsel appearing for defendant no.1 also

states that so far as sub-para (d) of para 66 of the prayer of the plaint is concerned, the defendant no.1 shall withdraw its pending Trade Mark Application bearing nos.7210390 and 7210391 in Classes 41 and 42, respectively for the PS POWER SCHOOL (Device mark)/ within four weeks from date.

6. On account of the aforesaid statement, Mr. Roomi, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff, on instructions, states that the prayer so far as costs and damages is concerned, they are being given up.

7. In terms of the aforesaid, binding the defendant to the aforesaid statement, the decree sheet be drawn up in terms of sub-paras (a), (b), (c) & (d) of para 66 of the plaint suit.

8. The Court Fees shall be refunded to the plaintiff under the provisions of Section 16 of the Court Fees, 1870 read with Court Fees (Delhi Amendment), 2026 upon completion of all the formalities, as per rules.

9. Noting the above, the suit is decreed and disposed of alongwith all the pending applications. TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J MAY 29, 2026 kct

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Powerschool Group LLC vs Academicae Ai Technology Private Lim... Same Subject Education Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Tushar Rao Gedela