Nikhil Agarwal vs Priya Agarwal

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Jan 05, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1265387

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1265387
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani
Decided On: Jan 05, 2026
Case Number: CRL.REV.P./591/2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nikhil Agarwal

Advocate Mr. Amish Aggarwal, Mr. Rahul Yadav

Respondent

Priya Agarwal

Advocate Mr. Vivek Vidyarthi, Mr. Suvigya Vidyarthi, Mr. Sarvagya Vidyarthi, Mr. Nischay Chaudhary, Ms. Apoorva Singh Ms. Rushali Rawat

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.rev.p. 591/2019 & crl.m.a. 10643/2019 nikhil agarwal .....petitioner through: mr. amish aggarwal and mr. rahul yadav, advocates.versuspriya agarwal .....respondent through: mr. vivek vidyarthi, mr. suvigya vidyarthi, mr. sarvagya vidyarthi, mr. nischay chaudhary, ms. apoorva singh ms. rushali rawat and ms, samriddhi shukla, advocates.coram:hon'ble mr. justice anup jairam bhambhaniorder% 05.01.2026 mr. amish aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that as was recorded in order dated 09.05.2025, the parties have resolved their inter-se disputes vidé settlement agreement dated 25.04.2025 arrived at through mediation; and have resumed co-habitation. counsel however submits that as per clause-(i) of the settlement agreement, the parties had agreed to withdraw their cases only after expiration of period of 06 months from the date of signing of the agreement. counsel submits that that period is now over; and the parties are ready for disposal of the present case. learned counsel is present on behalf of the respondent and concurs with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. in view of the above, and in terms of settlement agreement dated 25.04.2025, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn.crl.rev.p. 591/2019 page 1 of 2 pending applications, if any, stand disposed-of. learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had deposited a certain sum of money by way of a fixed deposit receipt with the registrar general of this court, which may now be refunded/returned to thepetitioner. however, counsel is unable to furnish any specifics of the orderunder which such deposit was made. in the circumstances, the petitioner is granted liberty to move an appropriate application containing the requisite particulars, seeking the above relief. anup jairam bhambhani, j january 5, 2026 ss crl.rev.p. 591/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.REV.P. 591/2019 & CRL.M.A. 10643/2019 NIKHIL AGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amish Aggarwal and Mr. Rahul Yadav, Advocates.
versus
PRIYA AGARWAL .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vivek Vidyarthi, Mr. Suvigya Vidyarthi, Mr. Sarvagya Vidyarthi, Mr. Nischay Chaudhary, Ms. Apoorva Singh Ms. Rushali Rawat and Ms, Samriddhi Shukla, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI

ORDER

% 05.01.2026 Mr. Amish Aggarwal, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits, that as was recorded in order dated 09.05.2025, the parties have resolved their inter-se disputes vidé Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025 arrived at through mediation; and have resumed co-habitation. Counsel however submits that as per clause-(i) of the settlement agreement, the parties had agreed to withdraw their cases only after expiration of period of 06 months from the date of signing of the agreement. Counsel submits that that period is now over; and the parties are ready for disposal of the present case. Learned counsel is present on behalf of the respondent and concurs with the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. In view of the above, and in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 25.04.2025, the present petition is disposed-of as withdrawn.

CRL.REV.P. 591/2019 Page 1 of 2 Pending applications, if any, stand disposed-of. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had deposited a certain sum of money by way of a fixed deposit receipt with the Registrar General of this court, which may now be refunded/returned to the

petitioner. However, counsel is unable to furnish any specifics of the order

under which such deposit was made. In the circumstances, the petitioner is granted liberty to move an appropriate application containing the requisite particulars, seeking the above relief. ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J JANUARY 5, 2026 ss CRL.REV.P. 591/2019 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Nikhil Agarwal vs Priya Agarwal Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani