Atanu Chatterjee and Ors. vs Union of Inida and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 22, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1264561

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1264561
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Om Prakash Shukla
Decided On: May 22, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(C)/6548/2026
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Atanu Chatterjee and Ors.

Advocate Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Mr. Waheb Hussaini, Mr. Aniruddha Das, Ms. Dibsha Nanda, Mr. Mohit Garg, Mr. Rohan Mandal

Respondent

Union of Inida and Ors

Advocate Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, Mr. Amit Acharya, Mr. Binod Kumar Upadhyay, Ms. Km. Pratima Devi, Ms. Preeti Kumari, Ms. Himanshi Singh, Ms. Pinki Pawar, Mr. Rohit Kumar, Ms. Monalisha Pradhan

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 6548/2026, cm appls. 32313/2026, 32314/2026, atanu chatterjee and ors. .....petitioners through: mr. sanjoy ghose, sr. adv. with mr. waheb hussaini, mr. aniruddha das, ms dibsha nanda, mr. mohit garg and mr. rohan mandal, advs.versusunion of inida and ors .....respondents through: mr. arun kumar tiwari, cgsc with mr. amit acharya, gp with mr. binod kumar upadhyay, ms. km. pratima devi and ms. preeti kumari, advs. for uoi ms. himanshi singh, spc with ms. pinki pawar, gp with mr. rohit kumar and ms. monalisha pradhan, advs.coram:hon'ble mr. justice c. hari shankarhon'ble mr. justice om prakash shuklaorder (oral)% 22.05.20261. after some hearing, mr. sanjoy ghose, learned senior counselappearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to move the central administrative tribunal1 by way of a substantive oa raising the grievances advanced in this writ petition, in view of the judgment of the supreme court in k. ajit babu v. 1 “the tribunal”, hereinafter digitally signed w.p.(c) 6548/2026 page 1 of 2 union of india2.2. leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.3. in the event that the oa is filed, we request the tribunal to deal with the matter as expeditiously as possible and, if possible, to take a final call thereon within a period of six months from the date of filing of the oa.om prakash shukla, j.may 22, 2026/aky 2 (1997) 6 scc 473 digitally signed w.p.(c) 6548/2026 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6548/2026, CM APPLs. 32313/2026, 32314/2026, ATANU CHATTERJEE AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Waheb Hussaini, Mr. Aniruddha Das, Ms Dibsha Nanda, Mr. Mohit Garg and Mr. Rohan Mandal, Advs.
versus
UNION OF INIDA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Kumar Tiwari, CGSC with Mr. Amit Acharya, GP with Mr. Binod Kumar Upadhyay, Ms. Km. Pratima Devi and Ms. Preeti Kumari, Advs. for UOI Ms. Himanshi Singh, SPC with Ms. Pinki Pawar, GP with Mr. Rohit Kumar and Ms. Monalisha Pradhan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA

ORDER (ORAL)

% 22.05.2026

1. After some hearing, Mr. Sanjoy Ghose, learned Senior Counsel

appearing for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to move the Central Administrative Tribunal1 by way of a substantive OA raising the grievances advanced in this writ petition, in view of the judgment of the Supreme Court in K. Ajit Babu v. 1 “the Tribunal”, hereinafter Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 6548/2026 Page 1 of 2 Union of India2.

2. Leave and liberty is granted as aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

3. In the event that the OA is filed, we request the Tribunal to deal with the matter as expeditiously as possible and, if possible, to take a final call thereon within a period of six months from the date of filing of the OA.

OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J.

MAY 22, 2026/aky 2 (1997) 6 SCC 473 Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 6548/2026 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Atanu Chatterjee and Ors. vs Union of Inida and Ors Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice C.Hari Shankar,Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Om Pra...