Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Suresh Singh vs Argent Leasing & Finance Pvt Ltd

Suresh Singh vs Argent Leasing & Finance Pvt Ltd

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 12, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1264060

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
RFA/165/2010
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Suresh Singh

Respondent

Argent Leasing & Finance Pvt Ltd

Advocate Mr. Arun K. Srivastva, Mr. M.S. Panwar, Ms. Shalini Mehdiratta

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ rfa 165/2010 suresh singh .....appellant through: none.versusargent leasing & finance pvt ltd .....respondent through: mr. arun k. srivastva, mr. m.s. panwar and ms. shalini mehdiratta, advocates for r-2 (through vc).coram:hon'ble mr. justice amit sharmaorder% 12.02.20261. this hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. the present appeal under section 96 of the cpc seeks the followingprayers: “i. allow the present appeal with cost. ii. set-aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 29.10.2009 in case suit bearing no. 813/08/06, titled m/s argent leasing & finance pvt. ltd. vs. suresh singh & anr. passed by the court of sh. surinder s. rathi adj, (central)-07, delhi and dismiss the suit accordingly. iii. pass such further and other orders as this hon’ble court may deem fit and proper.”3. none appears on behalf of the appellant today.4. there was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on previous dates of hearing as well, i.e., 15.04.2025 and 08.10.2025.5. vide order dated 15.04.2025, default notice was issued to the appellant. however, the notice has come back unserved with a report that the appellant has passed away.6. no steps have been taken to implead the legal representatives of the appellant.7. accordingly, the present appeal stands abated and is disposed of accordingly.8. pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. amit sharma, j february 12, 2026/bsr/sg

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ RFA 165/2010 SURESH SINGH .....Appellant Through: None.

versus

ARGENT LEASING & FINANCE PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun K. Srivastva, Mr. M.S. Panwar and Ms. Shalini Mehdiratta, Advocates for R-2 (through vc).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA

ORDER

% 12.02.2026

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present appeal under Section 96 of the CPC seeks the following

prayers: “i. allow the present appeal with cost. ii. set-aside the impugned Judgment and Decree dated 29.10.2009 in case suit bearing no. 813/08/06, titled M/s Argent Leasing & Finance Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Suresh Singh & Anr. passed by the court of Sh. Surinder S. Rathi ADJ, (Central)-07, Delhi and dismiss the suit accordingly. iii. pass such further and other orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper.”

3. None appears on behalf of the appellant today.

4. There was no appearance on behalf of the appellant on previous dates of hearing as well, i.e., 15.04.2025 and 08.10.2025.

5. Vide order dated 15.04.2025, default notice was issued to the appellant. However, the notice has come back unserved with a report that the appellant has passed away.

6. No steps have been taken to implead the legal representatives of the appellant.

7. Accordingly, the present appeal stands abated and is disposed of accordingly.

8. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. AMIT SHARMA, J FEBRUARY 12, 2026/bsr/sg

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial