Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Mr Dalip Kumar vs the State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Mr Dalip Kumar vs The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263531

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.M.C./3349/2026
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Mr Dalip Kumar

Advocate Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain

Respondent

The State of Nct of Delhi and Anr

Advocate Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, Ms. Nishtha Handa, Mr. Ajay Walia

Excerpt

.....the learned app accepts notice on behalf of the state.3. the petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this court and have been identified by their counsel and investigating officer (io) concerned, police station aman vihar, delhi.4. brief facts of the case are that on 06.05.2014 at about 2:20 pm, thecomplainant herein had gone to collect water from a tanker stationed in front of her former residence, which had been sold in november 2013. during that time, an altercation allegedly arose with ms. shiv dulari regarding the filling of water. it is alleged that son of shiv dulari i.e. the present petitioner came out from his house and had used abusive language towards respondent no. 2, had assaulted her. subsequently, respondent no. 2/complainant had lodged the present fir against the petitioner. after investigation, the chargesheet was filed before the concerned court.5. during the pendency of the present case, with the intervention of common friends and relatives, both the parties have now amicably settled their disputes vide memorandum of understanding/compromise deed dated 08.01.2025.6. on a query made by this court, respondent no. 2 who has beenidentified by the io concerned, has categorically stated that the matter has been settled amicably after the petitioner had tendered his apology. therefore, in terms of the settlement, the complainant has no objection if the present fir is quashed.7. in view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved theirdifferences of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. it would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned fir and the proceedings pursuant thereto. there is no legal impediment in quashing the fir in question.8. accordingly, fir bearing no. 823/2014, registered at police station aman vihar, delhi for the commission of offence punishable under sections.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 3349/2026 MR DALIP KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Gunjan Sinha Jain, DHCLSC alongwith petitioner in person

versus

THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for the State with Ms. Nishtha Handa, Mr. Ajay Walia, Advocates and SI Ankesh, P.S. Aman Vihar Counsel for R-2 alongwith R-2 in person

CORAM:

HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

ORDER

% 30.04.2026

1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks quashing of the

FIR bearing No. 823/2014, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 354B/506/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter „IPC‟).

2. Issue notice. The learned APP accepts notice on behalf of the State.

3. The petitioner and respondent no. 2 are present before this Court and have been identified by their counsel and Investigating Officer (IO) concerned, Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi.

4. Brief facts of the case are that on 06.05.2014 at about 2:20 PM, the

complainant herein had gone to collect water from a tanker stationed in front of her former residence, which had been sold in November 2013. During that time, an altercation allegedly arose with Ms. Shiv Dulari regarding the filling of water. It is alleged that son of Shiv Dulari i.e. the present petitioner came out from his house and had used abusive language towards respondent no. 2, had assaulted her. Subsequently, respondent No. 2/Complainant had lodged the present FIR against the petitioner. After investigation, the chargesheet was filed before the concerned Court.

5. During the pendency of the present case, with the intervention of common friends and relatives, both the parties have now amicably settled their disputes vide Memorandum of Understanding/Compromise Deed dated 08.01.2025.

6. On a query made by this Court, respondent no. 2 who has been

identified by the IO concerned, has categorically stated that the matter has been settled amicably after the petitioner had tendered his apology. Therefore, in terms of the settlement, the complainant has no objection if the present FIR is quashed.

7. In view of the above, that the parties have amicably resolved their

differences of their own free will, and without any coercion, no useful purpose will be served by continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them. It would thus be in interest of justice to quash the abovementioned FIR and the proceedings pursuant thereto. There is no legal impediment in quashing the FIR in question.

8. Accordingly, FIR bearing No. 823/2014, registered at Police Station Aman Vihar, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 354B/506/509/34 of IPC and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

9. In view of the above, the present petition stands disposed of.

10. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 30, 2026/ns/ R

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial