Yogesh Kumar vs Rupesh Kumar Thakur - Chief Executive Officer - Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Borad & Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Apr 30, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263495

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1263495
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sachin Datta
Decided On: Apr 30, 2026
Case Number: CONT.CAS(C)/768/2026
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Yogesh Kumar

Advocate Mr. Hemant Choudhary

Respondent

Rupesh Kumar Thakur - Chief Executive Officer - Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Borad & Ors.

Advocate Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva, Mr. Harsh Preet Singh Chadha, Mr. H. Khanna, Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Ms. Madhu, Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Mr. S. Shukla, Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms. Yashita Jain

Excerpt

.....jain, advs. for dusib.coram:hon'ble mr. justice sachin dattasachin datta, j. (oral)1. the present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated11.02.2026 passed by this court in w.p.(c) 1945/2026. the said orderreads as under:- digitally signed cont.cas(c) 768/2026 page 1 of 32. it is alleged by the petitioner that despite the aforesaid directions, therespondents have failed to take requisite action and consequently, unauthorised construction and encroachment have taken place in respect of the property/ies in question.3. mr. mukesh gupta, learned standing counsel appearing for the mcdsubmits that a fresh inspection shall be carried out in respect of the property in question and if any unauthorised construction and encroachment is found, appropriate and immediate action shall be taken in accordance with law. let the concerned officials of the dusib also participate in the said fresh inspection being carried out by the mcd.4. it is assured and undertaken by the learned counsel for mcd that if digitally signed cont.cas(c) 768/2026 page 2 of 3any unauthorised construction is ongoing, appropriate steps shall be taken to bring the same to an immediate halt. further, action with regard to demolition of the unauthorised construction shall also be taken in accordance with law. the said statement and undertaking are taken on record.5. let the needful be done by the mcd expeditiously and in any event within a period of eight weeks from today.6. the petition is disposed of taking on record the aforesaid undertaking.7. let a compliance affidavit be filed by the respondents within a period of three months from today.8. in case, there is any shortcoming in the action taken by the mcd, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies. sachin datta, j april 30, 2026/uk digitally signed cont.cas(c) 768/2026 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of Decision: 30.04.2026 + CONT.CAS(C) 768/2026 YOGESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Hemant Choudhary, Adv.
versus
RUPESH KUMAR THAKUR - CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BORAD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaganmeet Singh Sachdeva (SC) along with Mr. Harsh Preet Singh Chadha, Mr. H. Khanna, Advs. for MCD Mr. Mukesh Gupta (SC) along with Ms. Madhu yadav, Ms. Sneha Roy, Ms. Gurleen Kaur, Mr. S. Shukla, Advs. Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi, Ms. Richa Dhawan, Ms. Yashita Jain, Advs. for DUSIB.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
SACHIN DATTA, J. (ORAL)
1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging wilful disobedience/ non-compliance of the directions contained in the order dated

11.02.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) 1945/2026. The said order

reads as under:- Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 768/2026 Page 1 of 3

2. It is alleged by the petitioner that despite the aforesaid directions, the

respondents have failed to take requisite action and consequently, unauthorised construction and encroachment have taken place in respect of the property/ies in question.

3. Mr. Mukesh Gupta, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the MCD

submits that a fresh inspection shall be carried out in respect of the property in question and if any unauthorised construction and encroachment is found, appropriate and immediate action shall be taken in accordance with law. Let the concerned officials of the DUSIB also participate in the said fresh inspection being carried out by the MCD.

4. It is assured and undertaken by the learned counsel for MCD that if Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 768/2026 Page 2 of 3

any unauthorised construction is ongoing, appropriate steps shall be taken to bring the same to an immediate halt. Further, action with regard to demolition of the unauthorised construction shall also be taken in accordance with law. The said statement and undertaking are taken on record.

5. Let the needful be done by the MCD expeditiously and in any event within a period of eight weeks from today.

6. The petition is disposed of taking on record the aforesaid undertaking.

7. Let a compliance affidavit be filed by the respondents within a period of three months from today.

8. In case, there is any shortcoming in the action taken by the MCD, the petitioner would be at liberty to avail appropriate legal remedies. SACHIN DATTA, J APRIL 30, 2026/uk Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 768/2026 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Yogesh Kumar vs Rupesh Kumar Thakur - Chief Executive Officer... Same Subject Education Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Sachin Datta