Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Union of India and Ors vs Indu Pratap Singh and Anr

Union of India and Ors vs Indu Pratap Singh and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 29, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263463

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CONT.CAS(C)/775/2026
Subject
Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue
Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Union of India and Ors

Advocate Mr. Mukul Singh, Mr. Adhiraj Singh, Mr. Aryan Dhaka

Respondent

Indu Pratap Singh and Anr

Advocate Mr. Shatadur Chakraborty, Ms. Sonia Dube, Mr. Tanishq Sharma

Excerpt

.....on account of ‘id-ul-zuha (bakrid)’.1. in compliance with order dated 18.05.2026, passed in the presentproceedings, the concerned representative mr. saumyajit das, official from m/s srei equipment finance limited, who is well-versed with the facts and circumstances of the present case, is present in court today. he submits that he has been duly authorised by board resolution of m/s srei equipment finance limited to appear in these proceedings and make appropriate statement before this court.2. he states on behalf of m/s srei equipment finance limited that thereis no objection whatsoever on behalf of the m/s srei equipment finance limited for transfer of the concerned rakes to the union of india. he affirms and acknowledges that the m/s srei equipment finance limited neither asserts any right/s whatsoever in the said rakes, nor is there any charge or lien in favour of the m/s srei equipment finance limited (or any group company)in respect thereof. it is agreed that there is no impediment whatsoever in transferring absolute title in respect of the said rakes to the union of india. the said statement is taken on record.3. the respondent no.1, the director of aviral minerals pvt. ltd., who appears virtually, also affirms that:(i) the physical possession of the rakes is already with the union of india.(ii) the title in the rakes is required to be vested absolutely in favour of the union of india/the petitioner.4. he states, on instructions, that for the said purpose, the respondent no.1 shall execute such documents as may be required by the petitioner.5. it is agreed that all the documents in the possession of the respondent no.1/director, aviral minerals pvt. ltd. in respect of the rakes, shall be handed over to the union on india.6. let the union of india sent the requisite documentation that is required to be executed by the respondent no.1 for transferring the absolute title in rakes in favour of union of india.7. it is agreed that the said documents shall.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CONT.CAS(C) 775/2026, CM APPL.29230/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC alongwith Mr. Adhiraj Singh, GP and Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advocates.

versus

INDU PRATAP SINGH AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shatadur Chakraborty, Sr. Adv. alongwith Ms. Sonia Dube, Ms.Saumya Sharma and Mr. Tanishq Sharma, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

ORDER

% 29.05.2026 The matter is taken up today as 28.05.2026 was declared a holiday on account of ‘Id-ul-Zuha (Bakrid)’.

1. In compliance with order dated 18.05.2026, passed in the present

proceedings, the concerned representative Mr. Saumyajit Das, official from M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited, who is well-versed with the facts and circumstances of the present case, is present in Court today. He submits that he has been duly authorised by Board Resolution of M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited to appear in these proceedings and make appropriate statement before this Court.

2. He states on behalf of M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited that there

is no objection whatsoever on behalf of the M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited for transfer of the concerned rakes to the Union of India. He affirms and acknowledges that the M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited neither asserts any right/s whatsoever in the said rakes, nor is there any charge or lien in favour of the M/s SREI Equipment Finance Limited (or any group company)

in respect thereof. It is agreed that there is no impediment whatsoever in transferring absolute title in respect of the said rakes to the Union of India. The said statement is taken on record.

3. The respondent no.1, the Director of Aviral Minerals Pvt. Ltd., who appears virtually, also affirms that:

(i) The physical possession of the rakes is already with the Union of India.

(ii) The title in the rakes is required to be vested absolutely in favour of the Union of India/the petitioner.

4. He states, on instructions, that for the said purpose, the respondent no.1 shall execute such documents as may be required by the petitioner.

5. It is agreed that all the documents in the possession of the respondent no.1/Director, Aviral Minerals Pvt. Ltd. in respect of the rakes, shall be handed over to the Union on India.

6. Let the Union of India sent the requisite documentation that is required to be executed by the respondent no.1 for transferring the absolute title in rakes in favour of Union of India.

7. It is agreed that the said documents shall be executed by the respondent no.1 within a period of 2 weeks from the date of receipt.

8. Needless to say, the same shall be without prejudice to any money claim being pursued by the respondent no.1 against the Union of India.

9. The present petition stands disposed of in the above terms. Pending application also stands disposed of. SACHIN DATTA, J MAY 29, 2026/at/sl

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial