Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pramila vs the State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Pramila vs The State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jan 20, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1261986

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A./329/2019
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pramila

Advocate Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam

Respondent

The State Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 329/2019 pramila .....appellant through: appearance not given.versusthe state govt of nct of delhi & ors .....respondents through: mr. sunil kumar gautam, app for the state with s.i. ashok kumar, p.s. sarojini nagar.coram:hon'ble ms. justice chandrasekharan sudhaorder% 20.01.20261. this is an appeal against the judgment dated 29.11.2017passed by the metropolitan magistrate (mahila court), saket courtby which the respondent nos. 2 to 4 were acquitted for the offencespunishable under sections 498a, 406 and 34 ipc.2. the learned additional public prosecutor brings to mynotice that the appeal as per the proviso to section 372 of the codeof criminal procedure, 1973 can be filed only before the sessionscourt and not before this court.3. section 372 and the proviso reads thus:“372. no appeal to lie unless otherwise provided.- no appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a criminal court except as provided for by this code or by any other law for the time being in force. [provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing inadequate compensation, and such appeal shall lie to the court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against theorder of conviction of such court.]”(emphasis supplied)4. in such circumstances, the present appeal will lie beforethe sessions court concerned.5. hence, the appeal is sent to the sessions court concernedfor consideration.6. the appellant shall appear before the sessions court on10.03.2026.chandrasekharan sudha, j january 20, 2026/rs

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 329/2019 PRAMILA .....Appellant Through: Appearance not given.

versus

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with S.I. Ashok Kumar, P.S. Sarojini Nagar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA

ORDER

% 20.01.2026

1. This is an appeal against the judgment dated 29.11.2017

passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate (Mahila Court), Saket Court

by which the respondent nos. 2 to 4 were acquitted for the offences

punishable under Sections 498A, 406 and 34 IPC.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor brings to my

notice that the appeal as per the proviso to Section 372 of the Code

of Criminal Procedure, 1973 can be filed only before the Sessions

Court and not before this Court.

3. Section 372 and the proviso reads thus:

“372. No appeal to lie unless otherwise provided.

- No appeal shall lie from any judgment or order of a Criminal Court except as provided for by this Code or by any other law for the time being in force. [Provided that the victim shall have a right to prefer an appeal against any order passed by the Court acquitting the accused or convicting for a lesser offence or imposing inadequate compensation, and such appeal shall lie to the Court to which an appeal ordinarily lies against the

order of conviction of such Court.]”

(Emphasis Supplied)

4. In such circumstances, the present appeal will lie before

the Sessions Court concerned.

5. Hence, the appeal is sent to the Sessions Court concerned

for consideration.

6. The appellant shall appear before the Sessions Court on

10.03.2026.

CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J JANUARY 20, 2026/rs

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial