Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Afiya Mulla vs State of Karnataka

Afiya Mulla vs State of Karnataka

Type Court Judgment Court Karnataka Dharwad Decided Feb 19, 2025
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1260945

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Karnataka Dharwad High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
WP/100608/2025
Subject
Miscellaneous

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Miscellaneous

Key legal issue
Miscellaneous

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Afiya Mulla

Respondent

State of Karnataka

Excerpt

.....for a period of 90 days citing that illness of convict which is evident from the medical certificate to provide him medical care for effective treatment and recovery the interest of justice and equity and etc., -2-this writ petition, coming on for orders, this day,order was made therein as under:oral order(per: the hon'ble mr. justice m.nagaprasanna)1. the petitioner's husband viz: manjurali (ctpno.4129) is convicted for the offence punishable under section 320 of the indian penal code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. the petitioner asserts that her husband is in judicial custody since eight years.2. heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned high court government pleader for the state.3. the petitioner has filed this petition seeking for adirection to release her husband on parole stating that his sister is suffering from terminal disease, and her husband’s support is required to provide further treatment to his ailing sister.4. given these circumstances, the reasons assignedseeking parole satisfies the grounds enumerated in section 643 of prison act which deals with eligibility of emergency -3- parole. therefore, the petitioner has established a prima facie case for release of her husband on parole. accordingly, i pass the following:order(1) the petition is allowed in part.(2) mandamus issues to the respondents to considerthe case of the petitioner and release the detenue / manjurali (ctp no.4129) on general parole for 45 days commencing from 21.02.2025, which becomes operational from the forenoon of 21.02.2025 subject to the following conditions:(i) the convict (ctp no.4129) shall mark hisattendance in the jurisdictional police station, weekly once throughout the period of his parole and it would be the responsibility of the jurisdictional police to take him to gaol, in the event, the convict (ctp no.4129) would evade going back to the gaol, after the expiry of the period of general parole.(ii) respondent no.2.....

Full Judgment

-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO.100608 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: AFIYA MULLA D/O. BASHIR AHMED MULLA, WIFE OF MANJUR ALI CTP - 4129, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O: 323-ANAND GALLI, LONDA, SUB DIST: HUKKERI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA - 591 301. …PETITIONER (BY SRI SIRAJUDDIN AHMED, ADVOCATE) AND:

1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, HOME DEPARTMENT, THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU - 560 001. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High

2. CHIEF SUPERINTENDENT, Court of Karnataka, CENTRAL PRISON, BELAGAVI - 591 108. Dharwad Bench, Dharwad …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHARAD V. MAGADUM, AGA)

THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO WHEREFORE IT IS MOST RESPECTFULLY PRAYED THAT THIS HON BLE COURT MAY GRACIOUSLY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT(S), ORDER(S) OR DIRECTION(S) AND THEREBY. DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO RELEASE THE PETITIONER’S HUSBAND MANJUR ALI CTP-4129 ON GENERAL PAROLE FOR A PERIOD OF 90 DAYS CITING THAT ILLNESS OF CONVICT WHICH IS EVIDENT FROM THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE TO PROVIDE HIM MEDICAL CARE FOR EFFECTIVE TREATMENT AND RECOVERY THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY AND ETC., -2-

THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:

ORAL ORDER

(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)

1. The petitioner's husband viz: Manjurali (CTP

No.4129) is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 320 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to undergo life imprisonment. The petitioner asserts that her husband is in judicial custody since eight years.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the State.

3. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking for a

direction to release her husband on parole stating that his sister is suffering from terminal disease, and her husband’s support is required to provide further treatment to his ailing sister.

4. Given these circumstances, the reasons assigned

seeking parole satisfies the grounds enumerated in Section 643 of Prison Act which deals with eligibility of emergency -3- parole. Therefore, the petitioner has established a prima facie case for release of her husband on parole. Accordingly, I pass the following:

ORDER

(1) The petition is allowed in part.

(2) Mandamus issues to the respondents to consider

the case of the petitioner and release the detenue / Manjurali (CTP No.4129) on general parole for 45 days commencing from 21.02.2025, which becomes operational from the forenoon of 21.02.2025 subject to the following conditions:

(i) The convict (CTP No.4129) shall mark his

attendance in the jurisdictional Police station, weekly once throughout the period of his parole and it would be the responsibility of the jurisdictional Police to take him to gaol, in the event, the convict (CTP No.4129) would evade going back to the gaol, after the expiry of the period of general parole.

(ii) Respondent No.2 shall stipulate strict conditions as are usually stipulated, to -4- ensure return of the detenue to the gaol and that he shall not commit any other offence during the period of parole.

(3) The petitioner is at liberty to seek extension of parole, which shall be considered looking at the conduct of the husband of the petitioner - convict while he is out on parole.

(4) The registry is directed to communicate the

order to the prison authority for its execution.

SD/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 53

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial