Deepak Bhalla vs Hyper Stealth Technologies Pvt. Ltd & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Mar 25, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1259937

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1259937
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta
Decided On: Mar 25, 2026
Case Number: CM(M)/628/2026
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak Bhalla

Advocate Mr. Shivek Trehan, Mr. Akash Chandna, Ms. Mainka Pandey

Respondent

Hyper Stealth Technologies Pvt. Ltd & Anr.

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ cm(m) 628/2026 deepak bhalla .....petitioner through: mr. shivek trehan, mr. akash chandna and ms. mainka pandey, advocates.versushyper stealth technologies pvt. ltd &anr......respondents through: none.coram:hon'ble mr. justice rajneesh kumar guptaorder% 25.03.20261. this hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.cm appl. 18920/2026(for exemption)2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of.cm(m) 628/20263. the present petition has been filed by the petitioner under article 227of the constitution of india, 1950, seeking directions to the trial court to hear and dispose of the respondent/plaintiff’s application under order xxxix rules 1 and 2 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 in cs (os) no. 611/2025 within a time-bound schedule.4. heard. record perused.5. the trial court is proceeding with matters pending before it inaccordance with its own board and pendency of the cases. in such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to pass any directions to the trial court to decide the matter within a time bound manner.6. accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. pendingapplication(s), if any, also stand disposed of.rajneesh kumar gupta, jmarch 25, 2026/nd/ik

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CM(M) 628/2026 DEEPAK BHALLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivek Trehan, Mr. Akash Chandna and Ms. Mainka Pandey, Advocates.

versus

HYPER STEALTH TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD &ANR.

.....Respondents Through: None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA

ORDER

% 25.03.2026

1. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.

CM APPL. 18920/2026(for exemption)

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.

CM(M) 628/2026

3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 227

of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking directions to the Trial Court to hear and dispose of the respondent/plaintiff’s application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 in CS (OS) No. 611/2025 within a time-bound schedule.

4. Heard. Record perused.

5. The Trial Court is proceeding with matters pending before it in

accordance with its own board and pendency of the cases. In such circumstances, it would not be appropriate to pass any directions to the Trial Court to decide the matter within a time bound manner.

6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of. Pending

application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.

RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J

MARCH 25, 2026/nd/ik

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Deepak Bhalla vs Hyper Stealth Technologies Pvt. Ltd & Anr. Same Subject Education Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta