Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Uma Rani and Ors vs Rajinder Prasad Singhal and Ors

Uma Rani and Ors vs Rajinder Prasad Singhal and Ors

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided May 19, 2026
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1259352

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CS(OS)/226/2026
Subject
Intellectual Property

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Intellectual Property

Key legal issue
Intellectual Property

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Uma Rani and Ors

Advocate Mr. Dinesh Garg, Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Ms. Vandana Bhatnagar

Respondent

Rajinder Prasad Singhal and Ors

Excerpt

.....the same, with the terms therein, being lawful.8. thus, in view of the aforesaid, this court finds no impediment indecreeing the suit in terms of the memorandum of family settlement dated 25th march, 2023.9. accordingly, with the consent of the parties, a consent/compromisedecree is hereby passed in the terms of the settlement agreement read with memorandum of family settlement dated 25th march, 2023, and following directions are issued in this regard: i. the parties are hereby bound by the aforesaid memorandum of family settlement, and they shall abide by the terms and conditions, as set out therein.ii. none of the parties shall raise any dispute with respect to the issueswhich have been settled by way of the memorandum of familysettlement dated 25th march, 2023.10. let decree sheet be prepared by the registry, in accordance with theaforesaid consent terms between the parties.11. considering the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, theregistry of this court is directed to issue a certificate of refund of full court fees to the plaintiffs.12. accordingly, the present suit, along with the pending application,stands disposed of.13. the next dates of 31st july, 2026 and 04th august, 2026 standcancelled.mini pushkarna, jmay 19, 2026/kr

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CS(OS) 226/2026 & I.A. No. 13999/2026 UMA RANI AND ORS. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Dinesh Garg, Adv. with Ms. Rachna Agrawal, Adv.

M: 9899007471

Email: [email protected]

versus

RAJINDER PRASAD SINGHAL AND ORS. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Vandana Bhatnagar, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

ORDER

% 19.05.2026 I.A. No. 13999/2026

1. The present is a joint application filed on behalf of the plaintiffs and

the defendants under Order XXIII Rules 3 and 3A read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) with a prayer for decreeing the present suit in terms of the Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 25th March, 2023.

2. Learned counsels appearing for the parties submit that since the

parties are closely related, the matter was discussed amongst themselves and with intervention of their well-wishers and relations, the parties had agreed to settle the disputes in terms of an oral family settlement.

3. Thus, it is submitted that the matter has been settled by and between

the parties in the terms as were agreed upon on 25th March, 2023 by way of

oral family settlement and as duly recorded in the written Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 25th March, 2023. The terms of the same are detailed in Para 4 of the present joint application.

4. Thus, it is submitted that a decree may be passed in terms of the

aforesaid Memorandum of Family Settlement.

5. Learned counsels appearing for both the parties jointly submit that the

settlement between the parties has been reached without any undue pressure, coercion and duress and that the parties have arrived at the settlement out of their own free will and volition.

6. The aforesaid statement is taken note of.

7. This Court has perused the terms of the Memorandum of Family

Settlement dated 25th March, 2023 between the parties, as noted in the present application and annexed therewith, and finds no impediment in accepting the same, with the terms therein, being lawful.

8. Thus, in view of the aforesaid, this Court finds no impediment in

decreeing the suit in terms of the Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 25th March, 2023.

9. Accordingly, with the consent of the parties, a consent/compromise

decree is hereby passed in the terms of the Settlement Agreement read with Memorandum of Family Settlement dated 25th March, 2023, and following directions are issued in this regard: i. The parties are hereby bound by the aforesaid Memorandum of Family Settlement, and they shall abide by the terms and conditions, as set out therein.

ii. None of the parties shall raise any dispute with respect to the issues

which have been settled by way of the Memorandum of Family

Settlement dated 25th March, 2023.

10. Let decree sheet be prepared by the Registry, in accordance with the

aforesaid consent terms between the parties.

11. Considering the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, the

Registry of this Court is directed to issue a Certificate of Refund of full Court Fees to the plaintiffs.

12. Accordingly, the present suit, along with the pending application,

stands disposed of.

13. The next dates of 31st July, 2026 and 04th August, 2026 stand

cancelled.

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

MAY 19, 2026/KR

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial