Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Satish vs State

Satish vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 25, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1258968

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
CRL.A./655/2004
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Satish

Advocate Mr. Mukesh Kumar

Respondent

STATE

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 655/2004 satish .....appellant through: none.versusstate .....respondent through: mr. mukesh kumar, app for the state with si vinod kumar, ps mehrauli.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vimal kumar yadavorder% 25.02.20261. hybrid mode.2. it has been reported by the police that the appellant is no more andthe factum of death has been verified. the report is shown in the court by the learned app, which shall be placed on record today itself.3. in such circumstances, the appeal stands abated.vimal kumar yadav, jfebruary 25, 2026/psthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 27/02/2026 at 12:19:48

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.A. 655/2004 SATISH .....Appellant Through: None.

versus

STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with SI Vinod Kumar, PS Mehrauli.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

ORDER

% 25.02.2026

1. Hybrid mode.

2. It has been reported by the Police that the Appellant is no more and

the factum of death has been verified. The report is shown in the Court by the learned APP, which shall be placed on record today itself.

3. In such circumstances, the Appeal stands abated.

VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J

FEBRUARY 25, 2026/ps

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 27/02/2026 at 12:19:48

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial