Jitender Kumar and Ors vs State Govt of Nct Delhi and Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Feb 12, 2026

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1256390

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1256390
Court: Delhi High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee
Decided On: Feb 12, 2026
Case Number: CRL.M.C./1194/2026
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Jitender Kumar and Ors

Advocate Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Mr. Raghuinder Verma, Mr. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Bharat Sharma

Respondent

State Govt of Nct Delhi and Anr

Excerpt

.....saurabh banerjeeorder% 12.02.20261. by virtue of the present petition under section 528 of the bharatiyanagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of fir no.471/2022 dated 12.05.2022 registered at ps: shalimar bagh under sections 498a/406/34 of the indian penal code, 1860 (ipc) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the settlement agreement dated 27.03.2025 [annexure p5] arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before delhi mediation centre, rohini district courts, delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.2. issue notice.3. learned app for the state accepts notice, and submits that he hasno objection to the quashing of the aforesaid fir.4. respondent no.2, present in court, also accepts notice and affirmsthe terms of the aforesaid settlement agreement whereby the petitioner no.1 has already paid her a sum of rs.5,50,000/- out of the total settlement amount of rs.7,00,000/- and has further handed over a dd dated 18.12.2025 bearing no.00544 (axis bank, branch rani bagh, delhi) of rs.1,50,000/- in court to her today as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. she further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent, and she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid fir.5. the petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in court, as well astheir credentials, as on record, have been identified by the io.6. since, a settlement has already been arrived at voluntarily betweenthe parties, as also since, accompanying affidavit(s) of the parties involved have also been filed herewith, and the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions thereof, following the law laid down by the hon’ble supreme court in jitendra raghuvanshi & ors. vs. babita raguvanshi & anr. (2013) 4 scc 58, gian singh vs. state of punjab &.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ CRL.M.C. 1194/2026, CRL.M.A. 4778/2026 JITENDER KUMAR AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sharma, Adv. alongwith the petitioners

Versus

STATE GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for the State with Mr. Ashish Mahani, Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Mr. Bharat Sharma, Advs. alongiwth the respondent no.2 SI- Bharat Lohchab, PS: South Rohini SI- Dairaj Singh, PS: Shalimar Bagh

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

ORDER

% 12.02.2026

1. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.471/2022 dated 12.05.2022 registered at PS: Shalimar Bagh under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement Agreement dated 27.03.2025 [Annexure P5] arrived at between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi, which is accompanied by their respective proofs of identity.

2. Issue notice.

3. Learned APP for the State accepts notice, and submits that he has

no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

4. Respondent no.2, present in Court, also accepts notice and affirms

the terms of the aforesaid Settlement Agreement whereby the petitioner no.1 has already paid her a sum of Rs.5,50,000/- out of the total settlement amount of Rs.7,00,000/- and has further handed over a DD dated 18.12.2025 bearing No.00544 (Axis Bank, Branch Rani Bagh, Delhi) of Rs.1,50,000/- in Court to her today as full and final settlement of all her present, past and future claims including alimony, maintenance, etc. She further submits that her marriage with the petitioner no.1 has since been dissolved by mutual consent, and she has no objection to the quashing of the aforesaid FIR.

5. The petitioners and the respondent no.2, present in Court, as well as

their credentials, as on record, have been identified by the IO.

6. Since, a settlement has already been arrived at voluntarily between

the parties, as also since, accompanying affidavit(s) of the parties involved have also been filed herewith, and the parties shall remain bound by all the terms and conditions thereof, following the law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Jitendra Raghuvanshi & Ors. vs. Babita Raguvanshi & Anr. (2013) 4 SCC 58, Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Narinder Singh & Ors. vs. State of Punjab & Anr.

(2014) 6 SCC 466, continuation of the FIR against the petitioners will be

an exercise in futility.

7. Accordingly, the petition is allowed and FIR No.471/2022 dated

12.05.2022 registered at PS: Shalimar Bagh under Sections 498A/406/34 of the IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom are hereby quashed.

8. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of.

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

FEBRUARY 12, 2026/Ab

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2026 Same Parties Jitender Kumar and Ors vs State Govt of Nct Delhi and Anr Same Subject Education Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Saurabh Banerjee