State vs Fazil and Ors.

STATE vs Fazil and Ors.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Feb 27, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1256121

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1256121
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan
Decided On: Feb 27, 2026
Case Number: TR.P.(CRL.)/10/2026
Subject: Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue: Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

STATE

Advocate Ms. Manjeet Arya

Respondent

Fazil and Ors.

Advocate Mr. Mohd. Yusuf

Excerpt

.....counsel.3. mr. tarang srivastava, learned additional public prosecutor,submits that service shall be effected upon jubair @ sonu in accordance with law during the course of the day.4. mr. mishra and accused fazil, who is present in person, submit thatthey have no objection to the transfer in view of the provisions of the nia act.5. list on 27.02.2026.”tr.p.(crl.) 10/2026 page 1 of 23. in pursuance of the order dated 24.02.2026, mr. mohd. yusuf,learned counsel for accused no. 3, appears and submits that accused jubair @ sonu (accused no. 3) is present in court. mr. yusuf states that accused no. 3 has no objection to the transfer of the proceedings in view of the provisions of the nia act.4. in view of the above, and having regard to the fact that chargeshave been framed in respect of scheduled offences under the nia act, it is directed that the proceedings in sessions case no. 818/2024 titled ‘state v. fazil & ors.’, presently pending before the jurisdictional court in the central district, tis hazari courts, be transferred to the special court under the nia act at patiala house courts, new delhi.5. the matter be placed before the learned principal district &sessions judge, patiala house courts, new delhi, on 10.03.2026 at 2:00 p.m. for further directions.6. the investigating officer is directed to inform the remainingaccused accordingly.prateek jalan, jfebruary 27, 2026‘sv/jm’/tr.p.(crl.) 10/2026 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ TR.P.(CRL.) 10/2026

STATE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State

versus

FAZIL AND ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Mohd. Yusuf, Advocate for accused No. 3

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

ORDER

% 27.02.2026

1. This transfer petition has been registered on the basis of a

communication dated 29.01.2026 received from the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, stating that the proceedings are required to be transferred to the Special/Designated Court, as charges have been framed in respect of Scheduled Offences under the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 [“NIA Act”].

2. By order dated 24.02.2026, the Court recorded as follows:

“2. Notice was issued on 09.02.2026, pursuant to which accused Fazil is present in person, and co-accused Mohsin is represented by Mr. V.S. Mishra, learned counsel.

3. Mr. Tarang Srivastava, learned Additional Public Prosecutor,

submits that service shall be effected upon Jubair @ Sonu in accordance with law during the course of the day.

4. Mr. Mishra and accused Fazil, who is present in person, submit that

they have no objection to the transfer in view of the provisions of the NIA Act.

5. List on 27.02.2026.”

TR.P.(CRL.) 10/2026 Page 1 of 2

3. In pursuance of the order dated 24.02.2026, Mr. Mohd. Yusuf,

learned counsel for accused No. 3, appears and submits that accused Jubair @ Sonu (accused No. 3) is present in Court. Mr. Yusuf states that accused No. 3 has no objection to the transfer of the proceedings in view of the provisions of the NIA Act.

4. In view of the above, and having regard to the fact that charges

have been framed in respect of Scheduled Offences under the NIA Act, it is directed that the proceedings in Sessions Case No. 818/2024 titled ‘State v. Fazil & Ors.’, presently pending before the jurisdictional Court in the Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, be transferred to the Special Court under the NIA Act at Patiala House Courts, New Delhi.

5. The matter be placed before the learned Principal District &

Sessions Judge, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi, on 10.03.2026 at 2:00 P.M. for further directions.

6. The Investigating Officer is directed to inform the remaining

accused accordingly.

PRATEEK JALAN, J

FEBRUARY 27, 2026

‘SV/JM’/

TR.P.(CRL.) 10/2026 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties STATE vs Fazil and Ors. Same Subject Criminal Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan