Skip to content
Try for free
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.
See full guide →

Sumeet Doonga & Ors vs.the State & Anr

Sumeet Doonga & Ors vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 06, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226513

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases
AI Brief & Ask Semantic Search Verdict Lens Devil's Bench DocMind
Start free trial See sample brief

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sumeet Doonga & Ors

Respondent

The State & Anr

Excerpt

.....consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.11.2010 as per hindu rites and rituals. one female child was born out of the wedlock namely kumar bani. due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 15.05.2014.7. the petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide memorandum of settlement dated 22.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si jagdip malik of police station jagat puri and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. crl.m.c. 5669/2019 page 2 of 3 9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.406/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered at police station jagat puri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge november06 2019 ms crl.m.c. 5669/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~50 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

06. 11.2019 + CRL.M.C. 5669/2019 SUMEET DOONGA & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr. Ravi Bhargava with Ms. Priya Gupta, Advs. versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr. K.K. Ghei, APP for State Mr. S. G. Asthana, Adv. for R-2 with respondent no.2 in person SI Jogdeep Malik, PS Jagat Puri CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Crl. M.A. 39786/2019 JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5669/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.406/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered at Police Station Jagat Puri and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 5669/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 14.11.2010 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One female child was born out of the wedlock namely Kumar Bani. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2, they started living separately from 15.05.2014.

7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement vide memorandum of settlement dated 22.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Jagdip Malik of Police Station Jagat Puri and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. CRL.M.C. 5669/2019 Page 2 of 3 9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.406/2014 dated 04.07.2014 registered at Police Station Jagat Puri and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE NOVEMBER06 2019 ms CRL.M.C. 5669/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Sumeet Doonga & Ors vs The State & Anr Same Subject Land Acquisition
Land Acquisition

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial
1M+ judgments indexed

Brief any judgment in 18 sections.

Search Supreme Court, High Courts, and tribunals - then open an AI Brief on any result. Core search is free; full AI desk free for 7 days.

Start 7-day free trial - no card Talk to Sales