Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Anwar Mian Alias Md. Anwar Vs. State of Bihar

Anwar Mian Alias Md. Anwar vs State of Bihar

Type Court Judgment Court Patna Decided Oct 01, 1996
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/122648

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Patna High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
Criminal Misc. No. 5635 of 1996 (R)
Subject
;Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 436 and Schedule First--Indian Penal Code, 1860--Section 415, 417 and 376-Bail application--Offence of commission of sexual intercourse by consent after assurance of marriage--Is of cheating--Falls under Section 417 and not under Section 415--As such, bailable--Bail directed t...

Key legal issue
;Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anwar Mian Alias Md. Anwar

Advocate Mr. Ramawtar Sharma

Respondent

State of Bihar

Court's Analysis

Prior History

P.K. Sarkar, J.
1. Heard Mr. Ramawtar Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jawahar Pd. learned Additional. P.P. for the State. Mr. Sharma submits that from the allegation itself it appears that the sexual intercourse was done with consent with an assurance that the petitioner would marry the victim. In the impugned order, the Additional. Sessions Judge observed that this case comes under Section 415, IPC and is non-bailable. Learned Counsel submits that this is not correct becaus

Excerpt

criminal procedure code, 1973 - section 436 and schedule first--indian penal code, 1860--section 415, 417 and 376-bail application--offence of commission of sexual intercourse by consent after assurance of marriage--is of cheating--falls under section 417 and not under section 415--as such, bailable--bail directed to be granted. - - 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, hazaribagh.p.k. sarkar, j.1. heard mr. ramawtar sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner and mr. jawahar pd. learned additional. p.p. for the state. mr. sharma submits that from the allegation itself it appears that the sexual intercourse was done with consent with an assurance that the petitioner would marry the victim. in the impugned order, the additional. sessions judge observed that this case comes under section 415, ipc and is non-bailable. learned counsel submits that this is not correct because section 415, ipc is the definition part and punishment is given in section 417, ipc which shows that it is bailable. in the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner (anwar mian alias md. anwar) be enlarged on bail in sadar (m) ps case no. 270 of 1996 (gr no. 1405 of 1996) on his furnishing bail bonds of rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the chief judicial magistrate, hazaribagh.

Full Judgment

P.K. Sarkar, J.

1. Heard Mr. Ramawtar Sharma, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jawahar Pd. learned Additional. P.P. for the State. Mr. Sharma submits that from the allegation itself it appears that the sexual intercourse was done with consent with an assurance that the petitioner would marry the victim. In the impugned order, the Additional. Sessions Judge observed that this case comes under Section 415, IPC and is non-bailable. Learned Counsel submits that this is not correct because Section 415, IPC is the definition part and punishment is given in Section 417, IPC which shows that it is bailable. In the facts and circumstances, let the petitioner (Anwar Mian alias Md. Anwar) be enlarged on bail in Sadar (M) PS Case No. 270 of 1996 (GR No. 1405 of 1996) on his furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10, 000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial