Shahnawaz @ Shanu vs.state

Shahnawaz @ Shanu vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 18, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226071

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226071
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 18, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shahnawaz @ Shanu

Advocate Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddqui

Respondent

State

Advocate Mr. G.M.Farooqui

Excerpt

in the high court of delhi at new delhi * % + w.p.(crl) 2509/2019 date of decision:18.10.2019 ........ petitioner shahnawaz @shanu through: mr. tahir ashraf siddqui, advocate state versus through: mr. g.m.farooqui, additional public prosecutor for state ..... respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi brijesh sethi, j (oral) judgment1 2.3. 4.5.... petitioner is seeking parole for a period of three months to enable him to file slp before the hon’ble supreme court. notice. learned app accepts notice. learned additional public prosecutor for state opposes the petition on the ground that his conduct is not satisfactory. heard. in the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on furlough for a period of three weeks from the date of his release on his executing a w.p.(crl.) 2509/2019 page 1 of 2 personal bond in the sum of rs.10,000/- with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the jail superintendent, subject to the following conditions: (i) the petitioner will not leave national capital territory of delhi without prior permission of the court; (ii) he will furnish to the investigating officer his mobile number and residential address where he will stay during the period of parole; (iii) he will report to the concerned station house officer (sho) /investigating officer (io), on every monday; (iv) in case of any change in his residential address or the mobile number, he will inform the sho/io; 6. the petition stands disposed of in above terms. ocrober18 2019 r (brijesh sethi) judge w.p.(crl.) 2509/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * % + W.P.(CRL) 2509/2019 Date of decision:18.10.2019 ........ Petitioner

SHAHNAWAZ @SHANU Through: Mr. Tahir Ashraf Siddqui, Advocate STATE Versus Through: Mr. G.M.Farooqui, Additional Public Prosecutor for State ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI BRIJESH SETHI, J (Oral) JUDGMENT1 2.

3. 4.

5.... Petitioner

is seeking parole for a period of three months to enable him to file SLP before the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Notice. Learned APP accepts notice. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for State opposes the petition on the ground that his conduct is not satisfactory. Heard. In the facts and circumstances of this case, this petition is allowed and the petitioner is directed to be released on furlough for a period of three weeks from the date of his release on his executing a W.P.(Crl.) 2509/2019 Page 1 of 2 personal bond in the sum of Rs.10,000/- with one local surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Jail Superintendent, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner will not leave National Capital Territory of Delhi without prior permission of the Court; (ii) He will furnish to the Investigating Officer his mobile number and residential address where he will stay during the period of parole; (iii) He will report to the concerned Station House Officer (SHO) /Investigating Officer (IO), on every Monday; (iv) In case of any change in his residential address or the mobile number, he will inform the SHO/IO; 6. The petition stands disposed of in above terms. OCROBER18 2019 r (BRIJESH SETHI) JUDGE W.P.(Crl.) 2509/2019 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Shahnawaz @ Shanu vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition