Deepak @ Deepu vs.state

Deepak @ Deepu vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 18, 2019

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1226066

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1226066
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 18, 2019
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Deepak @ Deepu

Respondent

State

Excerpt

$~36 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi date of decision; 18.10.2019 bail appln. 1694/2019 & crl.m.a.38636/2019 & crl.m.a.38635/2019 + deepak @ deepu ........ petitioner state through mr.abhay kumar, adv. versus through mr.g.m.farooqui, app with asi prem ram, ps hari nagar. ..... respondent coram: hon'ble mr. justice brijesh sethi brijesh sethi,j (oral) 1. judgment learned counsel for petitioner prays for the extension of interim bail for two months to look after her sister who is not keeping well.2. learned app opposes the extension of interim bail and submits that there are other family members available to look after sister of the petitioner.3. learned counsel for petitioner states that it is his last prayer for extension of interim bail and he will make the required necessary further arrangement for the future.4. in the facts and circumstances of the case, interim bail is further extended for a period of two months on the same terms and conditions.5. application along with all other pending applications stand disposed of. brijesh sethi, j october18 2019 ps

Full Judgment

$~36 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision; 18.10.2019 BAIL APPLN. 1694/2019 & Crl.M.A.38636/2019 & Crl.M.A.38635/2019 + DEEPAK @ DEEPU ........ Petitioner

STATE Through Mr.Abhay Kumar, Adv. versus Through Mr.G.M.Farooqui, APP with ASI Prem Ram, PS Hari Nagar. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BRIJESH SETHI BRIJESH SETHI,J (Oral) 1. JUDGMENT Learned counsel for petitioner prays for the extension of interim bail for two months to look after her sister who is not keeping well.

2. Learned APP opposes the extension of interim bail and submits that there are other family members available to look after sister of the petitioner.

3. Learned counsel for petitioner states that it is his last prayer for extension of interim bail and he will make the required necessary further arrangement for the future.

4. In the facts and circumstances of the case, interim bail is further extended for a period of two months on the same terms and conditions.

5. Application along with all other pending applications stand disposed of. BRIJESH SETHI, J OCTOBER18 2019 ps

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Deepak @ Deepu vs State Same Subject Education