Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sh. Ram Kumar vs.state & Anr.

Sh. Ram Kumar vs State & Anr.

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 15, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225968

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sh. Ram Kumar

Respondent

State & Anr.

Excerpt

$~54 * + in the high court of delhi at new delhi crl.m.c. 5223/2019 date of decision:15. 10.2019 sh. ram kumar ........ petitioner through mr. rajesh kumar, adv. versus ........ respondents through mr. izhar ahmed, app for state state & anr. coram: hon'ble mr. justice suresh kumar kait complainant no.2 in person judgment (oral) crl. m.a. 38095/2019 1.2. allowed, subject to all just exceptions. application is disposed of. crl.m.c. 5223/2019 3. vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing fir no.0843/2017 dated 20.12.2017, registered at ps nihal vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.4. 5. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state.6. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is crl.m.c. 5223/2019 page 1 of 2 taken up for final disposal.7. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.8. respondent no.2 is personally present in court and she has been identified by si ramesh kumar /io and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. the petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide compromise deed dated 27.11.2018.10. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.11. for the reasons afore-recorded, fir no.0843/2017 dated 20.12.2017, registered at ps nihal vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.12. the petition is allowed accordingly.13. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge october15 20/ms crl.m.c. 5223/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~54 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 5223/2019 Date of decision:

15. 10.2019 SH. RAM KUMAR ........ Petitioner

Through Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Adv. versus ........ RESPONDENTS

Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State STATE & ANR. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Complainant no.2 in person JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 38095/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 5223/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.0843/2017 dated 20.12.2017, registered at PS Nihal Vihar and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

4. 5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

6. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is CRL.M.C. 5223/2019 Page 1 of 2 taken up for final disposal.

7. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present petition is allowed.

8. Respondent no.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Ramesh Kumar /IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide compromise deed dated 27.11.2018.

10. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

11. For the reasons afore-recorded, FIR No.0843/2017 dated 20.12.2017, registered at PS Nihal Vihar and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

12. The petition is allowed accordingly.

13. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE OCTOBER15 20/ms CRL.M.C. 5223/2019 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial