Pushpa vs.geeta

Pushpa vs Geeta

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Oct 15, 2019

~3 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225961

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1225961
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Oct 15, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pushpa

Respondent

Geeta

Excerpt

.....leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the rent controller and an eviction order passed.2. respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under section 14(1) (e) of delhi rent control act, 1958 from one room (measuring 10 ft. x 9 ft.) forming part of property bearing no.4436, first floor, gali chaudhary nahar singh, pahari dhiraj, delhi-110 rc.rev.349/2015 page 1 of 3 006, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.3. learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from the petitioner, who is present in court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.4.... petitioner who is present in court in person, undertakes that she shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.... petitioner further undertakes that she shall pay rs. 2000/- per month as use and occupation charges till the time she hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.5.... petitioner further undertakes that she shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before she vacates the premises. he further undertakes that she shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the entire or any portion of the tenanted premises to any third party. she further undertakes that she shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the tenanted premises in the same condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.6. the undertaking is accepted. rc.rev.349/2015 page 2 of 3 7. learned counsel for the respondent under instructions from the respondent submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the respondent.8. 9. in view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. subject to.....

Full Judgment

$~13 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

15. 10.2019 RC.REV. 349/2015 PUSHPA GEETA versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. S.D. Ansari, Adv. with petitioner in person. For the Respondent: Mr. Dharm Vir Singh, Advocate with respondent in person. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

impugns order dated 04.03.2015 whereby the Leave to defend application of the petitioner has been dismissed by the Rent Controller and an eviction order passed.

2. Respondent had filed the subject eviction petition seeking eviction of the petitioner on the ground of bonafide necessity under Section 14(1) (e) of Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 from one room (measuring 10 ft. x 9 ft.) forming part of property bearing No.4436, First Floor, Gali Chaudhary Nahar Singh, Pahari Dhiraj, Delhi-110 RC.REV.349/2015 Page 1 of 3 006, more particularly as shown in red colour in the site plan attached to the eviction petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner under instructions from the petitioner, who is present in Court in person, seeks leave to withdraw the petition.

4.... Petitioner

who is present in Court in person, undertakes that she shall vacate and handover the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.... Petitioner

further undertakes that she shall pay Rs. 2000/- per month as use and occupation charges till the time she hands over the peaceful vacant possession of the tenanted premises to the respondent on or before 31.12.2020.

5.... Petitioner

further undertakes that she shall clear all water, electricity and other dues/charges in respect of the tenanted premises before she vacates the premises. He further undertakes that she shall not sublet, assign or part with the possession of the entire or any portion of the tenanted premises to any third party. She further undertakes that she shall not cause any damage to the tenanted premises and shall hand over the peaceful and vacant possession of the tenanted premises in the same condition as it exists today subject to normal wear and tear.

6. The undertaking is accepted. RC.REV.349/2015 Page 2 of 3 7. Learned counsel for the respondent under instructions from the respondent submits that the undertaking is also acceptable to the respondent.

8. 9. In view of the above, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Subject to petitioner filing an affidavit of undertaking in the above terms within a period of two weeks from today, execution of the impugned order dated 04.03.2015 shall remain stayed till 31.12.2020.

10. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. OCTOBER15 2019 ‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J RC.REV.349/2015 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Pushpa vs Geeta Same Subject Land Acquisition