Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Gaurav Panwar & Ors vs.the State & Anr

Gaurav Panwar & Ors vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 24, 2019
~3 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225581

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Gaurav Panwar & Ors

Advocate Mr. Manoj Kumar

Respondent

The State & Anr

Advocate Mr. Hirein Sharma, Mr. Gaurav Arora

Excerpt

.....2013.7. the petitioners and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 29.01.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably. the total settlement amount is ₹3,50,000/-(rupees (three lakhs and fifty thousand only). it is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹2,50,000/- (rupees two lakhs and fifty thousand only). a demand draft bearing no.326733 dated 19.09.2019 for the balance amount of ₹1,00,000/- (rupees one lakh only ) is handed over to the respondent no.2 today in the court.8. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by w/si sushma of police station - uttam nagar and submits that crl.m.c. 4840/2019 page 2 of 3 matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.492/2013 dated 07.09.2013 registered at police station - uttam nagar instituted for the offences punishable under sections 498a/4of the ipc and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge september24 2019 pb crl.m.c. 4840/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~50 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4840/2019 Date of decision:

24. 09.2019 GAURAV PANWAR & ORS Through: Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. ........ Petitioner

s versus THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for State with W/SI Sushma, PS - Uttam Nagar Mr. Gaurav Arora, Adv. for R-2/complainant CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A. 36724/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4840/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.492/2013 dated 07.09.2013 registered at Police Station - Uttam Nagar instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4840/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice issued.

5. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 09.11.2008 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. One female child was born out of the wedlock, namely, Darshita on 23.06.2011. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately from October, 2013.

7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 29.01.2018 and settled all their disputes amicably. The total settlement amount is ₹3,50,000/-(Rupees (Three Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only). It is submitted that the respondent No.2 has already received an amount of ₹2,50,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs and Fifty Thousand only). A demand draft bearing No.326733 dated 19.09.2019 for the balance amount of ₹1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only ) is handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by W/SI Sushma of Police Station - Uttam Nagar and submits that CRL.M.C. 4840/2019 Page 2 of 3 matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.492/2013 dated 07.09.2013 registered at Police Station - Uttam Nagar instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER24 2019 PB CRL.M.C. 4840/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial