Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Utpal Das & Ors vs.the State & Anr

Utpal Das & Ors vs The State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 18, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225437

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Utpal Das & Ors

Advocate Mr. Salim Alvi

Respondent

The State & Anr

Advocate Mr. Izhar Ahmad, Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal

Excerpt

.....started living separately since 20.12.2015.6. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide memorandum of understanding dated 11.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably. the total settlement amount is ₹5,00,000/- (rupees five lakhs only). it is submitted that the respondent no.2 has already received an amount of ₹3,00,000 (rupees three lakhs only). a demand draft bearing no.500469 dated 21.08.2019 for the balance amount of ₹2,00,000/- (rupees two lakhs only) is handed over to the respondent no.2 today in the court i.e. on 18.09.2019.7. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si chandan and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. crl.m.c.4701/2019 page 2 of 3 8. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.9. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.541/2017 dated 13.09.2017, registered at police station - ashok nagar, instituted for the offences punishable under sections 498a/4of the ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.10. the petition is allowed accordingly.11. order dasti, under the signature of court master. (suresh kumar kait) judge september18 2019 pb crl.m.c.4701/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~48 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

18. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4701/2019 UTPAL DAS & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through: Mr. Salim Alvi, Adv. with... Petitioner

s versus in person THE STATE & ANR ........ RESPONDENTS

Through: Mr. Izhar Ahmad, APP for State. Mr. Aditya Swarup Agarwal, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) CRL. M.A.36069/2019 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4701/2019 2. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.541/2017 dated 13.09.2017, registered at Police Station - Ashok Nagar, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom.

3. Notice issued. CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 1 of 3 4. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2. Subsequently, with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 24.09.2014 as per Hindu rites and rituals. One male child was born out of the wedlock namely, Neelanjan Das. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately since 20.12.2015.

6. The petitioner No.1 and respondent no.2 entered into an amicable settlement vide memorandum of understanding dated 11.04.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably. The total settlement amount is ₹5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs only). It is submitted that the respondent No.2 has already received an amount of ₹3,00,000 (Rupees three lakhs only). A demand draft bearing No.500469 dated 21.08.2019 for the balance amount of ₹2,00,000/- (Rupees two lakhs only) is handed over to the respondent No.2 today in the Court i.e. on 18.09.2019.

7. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Chandan and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further. CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 2 of 3 8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.541/2017 dated 13.09.2017, registered at Police Station - Ashok Nagar, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly.

11. Order dasti, under the signature of Court Master. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER18 2019 PB CRL.M.C.4701/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial