Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Naresh Chand & Ors vs.state & Anr

Naresh Chand & Ors vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Sep 12, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1225241

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Naresh Chand & Ors

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.6. the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 10.12.2005 as per hindu rites and rituals. due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.7. the petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before delhi mediation centre, rohini district courts, delhi vide settlement deed dated 21.05.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.8. the complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by si sachin of police station subhash place and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.9. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the concerned fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. crl.m.c. 4561/2019 page 2 of 3 10. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.421/2016 dated 18.07.2016 registered at police station subhash place instituted for the offences punishable under sections 498a/4of the ipc and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.11. the petition is allowed accordingly.12. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge september12 2019/ab crl.m.c. 4561/2019 page 3 of 3

Full Judgment

$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

12. 09.2019 + CRL.M.C. 4561/2019 NARESH CHAND & ORS ........ Petitioner

s Through Mr.Kuldeep Gola, Adv. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr. Izhar Ahmed, APP for State. ........ RESPONDENTS

SI Sachin PS Subhash Place. Mr.J.S. Arya, Adv. with Ms.Dimple Nagpal, Adv. for complainant with complainant in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) Crl. M.A. 35591/2019 1.

2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. CRL.M.C. 4561/2019 3. Vide the present petition, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.421/2016 dated 18.07.2016 registered at Police Station Subhash Place instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings arising therefrom. CRL.M.C. 4561/2019 Page 1 of 3 4.

5. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and counsel for the respondent no.2 and with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

6. The petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 got married on 10.12.2005 as per Hindu rites and rituals. Due to extreme incompatibilities between the petitioners and respondent no.2, they started living separately.

7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 with the intervention of their well wishers and relatives entered into an amicable settlement before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi vide settlement deed dated 21.05.2019 and settled all their disputes amicably.

8. The complainant is present in person with her counsel and has been identified by SI Sachin of Police Station Subhash Place and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

9. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the concerned FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further. CRL.M.C. 4561/2019 Page 2 of 3 10. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.421/2016 dated 18.07.2016 registered at Police Station Subhash Place instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/4
of the IPC and consequent proceedings therefrom are quashed.

11. The petition is allowed accordingly.

12. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE SEPTEMBER12 2019/ab CRL.M.C. 4561/2019 Page 3 of 3

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial