Shahbuddin vs.state

Shahbuddin vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Jan 14, 2019

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1220599

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1220599
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Jan 14, 2019
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Shahbuddin

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....public prosecutor with si anjani kumar singh coram: hon'ble mr. justice sunil gaur order (oral) vide impugned judgment of 28th march, 2018, appellant and his co- accused baldev raj @ billu have been held guilty of offence punishable under section 3 (1) (ii) of maharashtra control of organized crime act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘mcoca’). impugned order of 11th april, 2018, inflicts sentence for imprisonment for the period already undergone by appellant and co-accused, as they had already served sentence of eight years and four months with fine of ₹5,00,000/-each and in default of they have been directed to undergo simple imprisonment of two years. fine, page 1 of 2 crl.a. 1001/2018 at the outset, learned counsel for appellant on instructions of appellant, who is present in the court in pursuance to the production warrants, submits that the challenge in this appeal is confined to the sentence awarded in default of payment of fine. reliance is placed upon order of 13th september, 2018 of coordinate bench of this court in case of rafiq vs. state and baldev raj @ billu vs. state to seek reduction in the sentence awarded in lieu of the fine to the period already undergone by appellant. learned counsel for appellant submits that the case of appellant is at par with the case of co-accused baldev raj @ billu. upon notice, learned additional public prosecutor for respondent- state, does not dispute the aforesaid stand taken on behalf of appellant. upon hearing and on perusal of order of 13th september, 2018 passed by coordinate bench of the court in the case of rafiq vs. state and baldev raj @ billu vs. state, while maintaining the sentence awarded to appellant, the sentence inflicted in default of payment of fine, is reduced to the period already undergone by appellant, which is of more than five months as in the case of co-accused baldev raju @ billu. appellant be released forthwith, is accordingly disposed of in aforesaid terms. if not wanted in.....

Full Judgment

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Order: January 14 , 2019 CRL.A. 1001/2018 & CRL. (BAIL) 1516/2018 SHAHBUDDIN .....Appellant Through: Mr. Maninder Singh, Ms. Aekta Vats and Mr. Anuj Singh, Advocates Versus STATE .....Respondent Through: Ms. Neelam Sharma, Additional Public Prosecutor with SI Anjani Kumar Singh CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR ORDER

(ORAL) Vide impugned Judgment of 28th March, 2018, appellant and his co- accused Baldev Raj @ Billu have been held guilty of offence punishable under section 3 (1) (ii) of Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (hereinafter referred to as ‘MCOCA’). Impugned order of 11th April, 2018, inflicts sentence for imprisonment for the period already undergone by appellant and co-accused, as they had already served sentence of eight years and four months with fine of ₹5,00,000/-each and in default of they have been directed to undergo simple imprisonment of two years. fine, Page 1 of 2 CRL.A. 1001/2018 At the outset, learned counsel for appellant on instructions of Appellant, who is present in the Court in pursuance to the production warrants, submits that the challenge in this appeal is confined to the sentence awarded in default of payment of fine. Reliance is placed upon order of 13th September, 2018 of Coordinate Bench of this Court in case of Rafiq vs. State and Baldev Raj @ Billu vs. State to seek reduction in the sentence awarded in lieu of the fine to the period already undergone by appellant. Learned counsel for appellant submits that the case of appellant is at par with the case of co-accused Baldev Raj @ Billu. Upon notice, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent- State, does not dispute the aforesaid stand taken on behalf of appellant. Upon hearing and on perusal of order of 13th September, 2018 passed by Coordinate Bench of the Court in the case of Rafiq vs. State and Baldev Raj @ Billu vs. State, while maintaining the sentence awarded to appellant, the sentence inflicted in default of payment of fine, is reduced to the period already undergone by appellant, which is of more than five months as in the case of co-accused Baldev Raju @ Billu. Appellant be released forthwith, is accordingly disposed of in aforesaid terms. if not wanted in any other case. This appeal JANUARY14 2019 v CRL.A. 1001/2018 (SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE Page 1 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2019 Same Parties Shahbuddin vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition