Surinder Arora vs.state

Surinder Arora vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 26, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219482

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219482
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 26, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Surinder Arora

Respondent

State

Excerpt

$~10 * in the high court of delhi at new delhi % + judgment delivered on:26. 11.2018 bail appln. 1056/2018 & crl.m.b.757/2018 surinder arora state versus ........ petitioner ..... respondent advocates who appeared in this case: for the... petitioner : for the respondent: mr.vikas aggarwal and mr.anshu mahajan, adv. mr. hirein sharma, app for the state with si rawat singh, p.s.tilak nagar mr.rohit oberoi, adv. for r-2. coram:-"hon’ble mr justice sanjeev sachdeva judgment2611.2018 sanjeev sachdeva, j.(oral) 1.... petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in fir no.108/2018 under section 498a/4ipc, police station tilak nagar.2. subject fir emanates out of matrimonial discord. by order dated 08.05.2018 petitioner was granted interim protection subject to petitioner joining investigation.3. learned app under instructions from the investigating officer submits that investigation is complete and the charge sheet is in the bail appln. 1056/2018 page 1 of 2 process of being finalised for being filed in court.4. without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.5. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.6. 7. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master. november26 2018 rk sanjeev sachdeva, j bail appln. 1056/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

26. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1056/2018 & Crl.M.B.757/2018 SURINDER ARORA STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: For the Respondent: Mr.Vikas Aggarwal and Mr.Anshu Mahajan, Adv. Mr. Hirein Sharma, APP for the State with SI Rawat Singh, P.S.Tilak Nagar Mr.Rohit Oberoi, Adv. for R-2. CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT2611.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.108/2018 under Section 498A/4
IPC, Police Station Tilak Nagar.

2. Subject FIR emanates out of matrimonial discord. By order dated 08.05.2018 petitioner was granted interim protection subject to petitioner joining investigation.

3. Learned APP under instructions from the Investigating Officer submits that investigation is complete and the charge sheet is in the BAIL APPLN. 1056/2018 Page 1 of 2 process of being finalised for being filed in Court.

4. Without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

5. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses.

6. 7. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. NOVEMBER26 2018 rk SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN. 1056/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Surinder Arora vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition