Sunny Nagar vs.state

Sunny Nagar vs State

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Nov 16, 2018

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1219335

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1219335
Court: Delhi High Court
Decided On: Nov 16, 2018
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sunny Nagar

Respondent

State

Excerpt

.....assaulted is aged over 50 years of age and is not in a position to even walk properly. it is submitted that the co- accused ankit and aakash are on regular bail and co-accused ravi has been granted interim protection of anticipatory bail.4. vide order dated 30.07.2018, the petitioner was granted interim protection subject to his joining investigation.5. learned addl. pp, under instructions, submits that the petitioner did join the investigation and investigation has been concluded and charge sheet is being finalised and shall be filed shortly.6. without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, i am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.7. accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/io/sho shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/investigating officer/sho concerned.... petitioner shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. the petition is disposed of in the above terms. order dasti under signatures of the court master.8. 9. november16 2018/‘rs’ sanjeev sachdeva, j bail appln. 1774/2018 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:

16. 11.2018 BAIL APPLN. 1774/2018 SUNNY NAGAR STATE versus ........ Petitioner

..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

: Mr. Rajesh Jain and Ms. Sakshi Arora, Advocates For the Respondent: Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for the State with SI Amit Bhardwaj CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1611.2018 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) 1.... Petitioner

s seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.282/2018 under Sections 452/323/341/4
of the IPG, Police Station Ghazipur, New Delhi.

2. The allegations in the FIR against the petitioners are that the co- accused had entered into the office of the complainant and had an altercation with the complainant and his brother and assaulted them with sticks. The petitioner is alleged to have also entered into the office and assaulted the complainant and his brother with sticks.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated and false allegations have been made in the FIR as BAIL APPLN. 1774/2018 Page 1 of 2 the co-accused who is alleged to have assaulted is aged over 50 years of age and is not in a position to even walk properly. It is submitted that the co- accused Ankit and Aakash are on regular bail and co-accused Ravi has been granted interim protection of anticipatory bail.

4. Vide order dated 30.07.2018, the petitioner was granted interim protection subject to his joining investigation.

5. Learned Addl. PP, under instructions, submits that the petitioner did join the investigation and investigation has been concluded and charge sheet is being finalised and shall be filed shortly.

6. Without commenting on the merits of the case, and on perusal of the records, I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a case for grant of anticipatory bail.

7. Accordingly, it is directed that in the event of arrest, the arresting officer/IO/SHO shall release the petitioner on bail on his furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 15,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting officer/Investigating Officer/SHO concerned.... Petitioner

shall not do anything that may prejudice either the trial or the prosecution witnesses. The petition is disposed of in the above terms. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master.

8. 9. NOVEMBER16 2018/‘rs’ SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J BAIL APPLN. 1774/2018 Page 2 of 2

Same Court & Year Delhi · 2018 Same Parties Sunny Nagar vs State Same Subject Land Acquisition